- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- china@sopuli.xyz
- cross-posted to:
- world@quokk.au
- china@sopuli.xyz
cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/53072462
[…]
The central risk is not a sudden systemic collapse, but a drawn‑out period of sub‑par growth, weak returns on investment, and fragile confidence—a pattern that will sound familiar to students of Japan’s post‑1990 trajectory.
Several specific challenges stand out:
- Demographics: An aging, shrinking population caps housing demand and undermines the traditional link between urbanization and construction booms.
- Balance sheets: Developers, local governments, and some financial institutions face long, grinding deleveraging cycles.
- Policy trade‑offs: Stimulating housing too aggressively risks re‑inflating the bubble; tightening too hard risks tipping growth into a deeper downturn.
- Confidence: Once households lose faith in property as a one‑way wealth escalator, rebuilding sentiment can take years.
[…]



I don’t think you have read my comment.
You didn’t read or understand mine. You own your property in China the same way you own it in western countries. You have to pay to continue to own it in both countries, and they’re able to force you to sell if they want to build a highway where your house is, just like in western countries.
I can’t lose my home for criticizing the government. I can fight an eminent domain claim and be compensated properly.
Same is true in China, they have laws lmao.
Also you kinda can, eminent domain has famously been used against entire populations that a mayor, governor, or urban planner simply didn’t like.
Ok tankie
So what do you not actually care about whether property ownership is meaningfully different in China vs western countries beyond its use as hostile evidence?
I care about good faith arguments, and you’re not making one.
I told you how things actually work, in both China and America, is anything that doesn’t reinforce preconceived notions bad faith to you?
You’re using the USA, a country just as shit if not worse than China when it comes to human rights to try and make China look good.
That’s the bad faith argument.
No, this is simply wrong.