cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/53072462

Archived

[…]

The central risk is not a sudden systemic collapse, but a drawn‑out period of sub‑par growth, weak returns on investment, and fragile confidence—a pattern that will sound familiar to students of Japan’s post‑1990 trajectory.

Several specific challenges stand out:

  • Demographics: An aging, shrinking population caps housing demand and undermines the traditional link between urbanization and construction booms.
  • Balance sheets: Developers, local governments, and some financial institutions face long, grinding deleveraging cycles.
  • Policy trade‑offs: Stimulating housing too aggressively risks re‑inflating the bubble; tightening too hard risks tipping growth into a deeper downturn.
  • Confidence: Once households lose faith in property as a one‑way wealth escalator, rebuilding sentiment can take years.

[…]

  • HotznplotznOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I don’t think you have read my comment.

    • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      You didn’t read or understand mine. You own your property in China the same way you own it in western countries. You have to pay to continue to own it in both countries, and they’re able to force you to sell if they want to build a highway where your house is, just like in western countries.

      • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I can’t lose my home for criticizing the government. I can fight an eminent domain claim and be compensated properly.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Same is true in China, they have laws lmao.

          I can’t lose my home for criticizing the government.

          Also you kinda can, eminent domain has famously been used against entire populations that a mayor, governor, or urban planner simply didn’t like.

            • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 hours ago

              So what do you not actually care about whether property ownership is meaningfully different in China vs western countries beyond its use as hostile evidence?

                • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  I told you how things actually work, in both China and America, is anything that doesn’t reinforce preconceived notions bad faith to you?

                  • AceOnTrack@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    15 minutes ago

                    You’re using the USA, a country just as shit if not worse than China when it comes to human rights to try and make China look good.

                    That’s the bad faith argument.

      • HotznplotznOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        You own your property in China the same way you own it in western countries.

        No, this is simply wrong.