It’ll be the cheapest place, by an absurd margin, to play Baldur’s Gate 3.

  • stopthatgirl7OP
    link
    fedilink
    1310 months ago

    Microsoft did the right thing by softening their stance on system parity. Insisting on it would have hurt the Xbox further along the line, but now devs know they can still release on Xbox if they can’t get one or two features to run on the S.

    • @Facebones@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      510 months ago

      I didn’t know it wasn’t on Xbox, that’s GOTTA be hurtin em. I’m sure they’ll learn from this and make whatever exceptions need to be made far earlier next time.

      • lemmyvore
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 months ago

        If I’m not mistaken the only reason it’s not already on Xbox is because Microsoft insisted it needs to have shared screen on all models, which proved to be problematic and eventually impossible on S, but they refused to release it on X in the meantime.

        Basically it’s very much Microsoft’s own doing.

        • ampersandrew
          link
          fedilink
          310 months ago

          We don’t know that it’s impossible on the S. It may yet happen sometime after launch.

          • lemmyvore
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            Oh I see, I thought the dev team had pretty much given up on it.

            • stopthatgirl7OP
              link
              fedilink
              110 months ago

              They’re still trying to get it to work and are working with Microsoft engineers, from the last I heard.

    • @VentraSqwal@links.dartboard.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      510 months ago

      It’s already been hurting them a lot it sounds like. I don’t think Baldur’s Gate is the first game to not release on Xbox because they couldn’t achieve system parity with the S. If they’ve really softened on it, then that’s a good idea. Better late than never.