• PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Basically, in the last couple sentences, I am saying that even if someone rejects one or both of the two starting premises (i.e. that elections have strong constitutional protection, and that election results are under capitalist control), then why have midterms never been cancelled before, and if never before, then why now?

    • rubber_chicken [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      22 hours ago

      OK, so you’re asking, from the perspective of a lib who thinks Rs and Ds are actually opposed, why one hasn’t seized power previously. Hm. I think they’d say that all previous presidents really did love american norms and institutions in their own way and trump is a unique bad guy, first ruzzian president, etc.

      • PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        22 hours ago

        OK, so you’re asking, from the perspective of a lib who thinks Rs and Ds are actually opposed, why one hasn’t seized power previously.

        Yeah pretty much.

        Hm. I think they’d say that all previous presidents really did love american norms and institutions in their own way and trump is a unique bad guy, first ruzzian president, etc.

        My response would be “no good presidents lol amerikkka amerikkka amerikkka”…or on a day where I’m not absolutely fucking out-of-control furious at life and 🧊, I would carefully but firmly explain that Trump is really the logical conclusion of the amerikkka project as opposed to some aberration.