• Nemo's public admirer
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    But Soviet Union, the related Sovket bloc, China, India(our version was more influenced by Fabian/Nehruvian socialism, not really Marxist) n all were influenced by communism/socialism and account for a large portion of the global population.

    In your graph, the World curve follows the Asia curve. So the global trend could likely be because of the communist influence itself.

    Without adding that context, your addition of context doesn’t really add context, right?

    • Joe@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      The graph serves as simple contextualisation.

      All european countries were already on the same trajectory. Russia was lagging behind for perfectly understandable reasons, but it was on the same trajectory. The soviet movement came at the right moment to benefit from this (and yeah, there’s a good chance they accelerated it, and in the worst case were “not bad” as someone phrased it).

      A government would have had to monumentally screw up to not benefit from the rapid changes across europe at the time.

      If the OP (or many of the commenters here) want to demonstrate uniquely soviet achievements, there are better metrics to focus on than life expectancy.