tabris to Baldur's Gate 3@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agoLarian drops Series S split-screen as "solution" to bring Baldur's Gate 3 to Xbox this yearwww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square33fedilinkarrow-up196arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.org
arrow-up195arrow-down1external-linkLarian drops Series S split-screen as "solution" to bring Baldur's Gate 3 to Xbox this yearwww.eurogamer.nettabris to Baldur's Gate 3@lemmy.worldEnglish • 10 months agomessage-square33fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: gaming@beehaw.org
minus-square@CaptPretentious@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish15•edit-210 months agoIt is. CPU is only about 200Mhz slower Series X: 3.8 GHz, 3.6 GHz with SMT Series S: 3.6 GHz, 3.4 GHz with SMT But there’s much less RAM to work with and it’s slower by a LARGE margin Series X: 10 GB/320-bit & 6 GB/192-bit (16 GB total) Series S: 8 GB/128-bit & 2 GB/32-bit (10 GB total) And the GPU used in the S is less than half the power Series X: 52 CUs @ 1.825 GHz, 12.16 TFLOPS Series S: 20 CUs @ 1.565 GHz, 4.01 TFLOPS So it’s not just a little weaker, in 2 of the 3 areas (CPU/Memory/GPU) it’s massively cut down.
minus-squarecircuitfarmerlinkEnglish3•10 months agoYeah, having the series S as baseline seems untenable, lest all games get held back on the whole platform.
It is.
CPU is only about 200Mhz slower
But there’s much less RAM to work with and it’s slower by a LARGE margin
And the GPU used in the S is less than half the power
So it’s not just a little weaker, in 2 of the 3 areas (CPU/Memory/GPU) it’s massively cut down.
Yeah, having the series S as baseline seems untenable, lest all games get held back on the whole platform.