• @kameecoding@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    -7
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    is there any chance you are doing it while spouting Kremlin propaganda? because then there is maybe a time to look in the mirror on this one

    • @silvercove@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -510 months ago

      Anyone that disagrees with the US government is spouting Kremlin propaganda. Riiiiight…

      You are a joke.

      • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        910 months ago

        Anyone that disagrees with the US government is spouting Kremlin propaganda. Riiiiight…

        I mean, if you take what I said and completely change it, I can see why you might be upset at that. Though I would encourage you to reply to what I actually said.

        You are a joke.

        I am indeed a very funny guy, it’s a bit creepy that you know that though.

          • @stingpie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            110 months ago

            goes on an anti-tankie post Comments that his posts are always dogpilled by the most anti-tankie group. Claims ad hominem when someone points it out.

            :)

            • @silvercove@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              210 months ago

              Is it wrong to engage in a conversation with people we disagree with?

              Would you rather have us segregate based on our opinions?

          • @kameecoding@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            I merely posited that you might be getting into arguments because you have drank the Kremlin propaganda, but from your posts I see it’s more that youblike to defend the Chinese government for some reason or at least like to do “a Whatabout the USA”

            also I am not sure you ubderstand what ad hominem is, it’s attacking the person saying it rather what the person is saying, if I were to say “you are spouting Kremlin propaganda” would be the exact opposite since I would be “attacking” what you are saying not who you are.

            hope that helps

            • @silvercove@lemdro.id
              link
              fedilink
              English
              010 months ago

              A lot of americans and some other westerners always assume that anyone who disagrees with them must be infected with Russian/Chinese/(insert bogeyman) propaganda.

              Whereas the truth is that the Western civilization is on a murder spree and the rest of us who are not Westerners are disgusted by it.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
      link
      fedilink
      -1310 months ago

      Imagine living in the west and genuinely believing that it’s Kremlin propaganda that’s the problem.

        • @silvercove@lemdro.id
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1110 months ago

          The constant whataboutism is exhausting…

          whataboutism is what hypocrites say when challenged.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
          link
          fedilink
          -510 months ago

          The only thing exhausting is people using whataboutism to make false equivalents and avoid genuine discussion. People are subjected to orders of magnitude more US propaganda than Russian propaganda, and it clearly has a much greater effect on public opinion. Thanks to people being indoctrinated into US propaganda, they dismiss legitimate problems as fictional Russian propaganda. The fact that you can’t comprehend this illustrates the problem perfectly.

      • Solar Bear
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 months ago

        Imagine thinking any large state isn’t constantly injecting propaganda into the Internet. Couldn’t be me.

          • Solar Bear
            link
            fedilink
            English
            110 months ago

            What I said was that people in the west are subjected to orders of magnitude of western propaganda, and perhaps should worry about that first.

            I’m capable of worrying about two things. Perhaps even three on a good day.

            Chomsky even pointed out recently that censorship in the west now is even worse than it was in USSR.

            Media being bad because capitalism pushes them to do evil to further their own ends is not the same thing as censorship enforced with state violence. These are both bad things, but uniquely bad in their own ways. I’m sad that Chomsky’s age has caught up to him and he can no longer distinguish the two.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
              link
              fedilink
              -910 months ago

              I’m capable of worrying about two things. Perhaps even three on a good day.

              press x to doubt

              Media being bad because capitalism pushes them to do evil to further their own ends is not the same thing as censorship enforced with state violence. These are both bad things, but uniquely bad in their own ways. I’m sad that Chomsky’s age has caught up to him and he can no longer distinguish the two.

              It’s incredible that somebody could be so deplorably ignorant to think that US doesn’t enforce censorship with state violence. US tortured Manning and is currently having UK torture Assange for revealing US war crimes. Chapter 10 in this book gives lots of examples of political repression in US where activists have been harassed, arrested, and even assassinated by the state https://archive.org/details/DemocracyForTheFew16147062951821

              The only thing you should be sad about is your own ignorance. Maybe instead of claiming that Chomsky can’t distinguish things you should learn about what your regime actually does. Just a thought.

              • Solar Bear
                link
                fedilink
                English
                2
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                When people talk about censorship, they usually mean of media. Yes, I’m aware that the US government is an evil institution that targets activists and whistleblowers. You’ll never believe me, but I actually despise my government and nearly every person in it. However, authoritarian regimes also strike down those people, but additionally censor the media on top of it. So to say that state censorship is worse here and now is just asinine. There’s no need to make things up to seem worse than they are when they’re already very bad, it just leads to people swinging at ghosts.

                • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -810 months ago

                  Every government is authoritarian by its very nature. The government derives authority from having monopoly on legalized violence. The only reason there is the illusion of freedom of speech is due to the fact that mainstream views are carefully curated. Any ideas that are seen as a threat are eliminated just as ruthlessly in the west as anywhere else. Entire books have been written on this subject.

                  Nobody is making anything up here. The reality is that state censorship in the west is no different from the countries you consider authoritarian, the only difference is that it’s dressed up in a way that’s palatable to western public. In fact, it could be argued that governments in places like China are simply more honest with their public. They’re explicit regarding what ideas they reject while the west uses sophistry to create an illusion of freedoms that don’t translate into anything tangible.

                  • Solar Bear
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    2
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    Every government is authoritarian by its very nature. The government derives authority from having monopoly on legalized violence.

                    For goodness’ sake, can we not do this? I’m an anarchist, I know this. I oppose the state on a conceptual level for this very reason. I’m speaking to you like a normal person using language that I know you understood the intended meaning of. There’s no need to engage in academic fartsniffery here. Just be normal.

                    The only reason there is the illusion of freedom of speech is due to the fact that mainstream views are carefully curated.

                    The owners of our media have a vested interest in maintaining their own control. They are not compelled to act by outside force, they largely act of their own free will to maintain their position in our corrupt system. Understanding this distinction is crucial to being able to fix it. This is the true insidious nature of our system, at this point it is maintained by people pursuing their own interests rather than by an overarching plot. There’s no need for one anymore, it is self-sustaining and perpetuating, like a cancer.