This is an OS which has everything. It’s clean, it’s simple, it has a helpful community, stable code, and even pretty good package counts to support nearly any desktop/workstation activity.

And yet, I feel like there are nagging issues which ultimately affect all non-mainstream1 OSes. Display driver complications, janky system upgrades, a lack of groupware clients. I’m not picking on OpenBSD, I love the distro and I think it should succeed in this particular area (the desktop/workstation) where other open source alternatives have failed, but why hasn’t anybody managed to make it happen yet?

For a while, there was a similar hope around DragonflyBSD in the FreeBSD community, but I don’t know where that ended up… I do know I see nobody really using it.

What’s it going to take?

1Obviously, I mean MacOS and Windows, since Linux is at least as hampered on the desktop, perhaps moreso on account of the poor community and scattered vision.

  • @lntl
    link
    English
    41 year ago

    OpenBSD can be used for a desktop and I’ve used it for that in the past… but IMO it shines as a server. Why? Today’s workflows often include a binary which isn’t available on OpenBSD. This could be nvidia’s CUDA drivers or Adobe Photoshop for example.

    OpenBSD excels in the space that doesn’t depend on these things: gateway device, email server, LAMP, lemmy?