• CheesyFox
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 个月前

    is it ripgrep level of “crazy fast” tho?

    • masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 个月前

      It’s far faster. Ripgrep has to search every file exhaustively at query time. Windows Search indexes every file at write time (or a background job) so the search results are near instantaneous … at least, that’s how it used to work. I don’t know what happened to it over the past 5-10 years.

        • masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 个月前

          Everything could do this but sometimes you don’t want to.

          i.e. you’re trading off the background indexing resource usage for instant search results, if you’re not frequently searching but are frequently using most of your resources (like let’s say on a web server), then that may not be a tradeoff worth making.

          • TheBlackLounge@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 个月前

            NTFS drives have an index built-in. It’s not fit for search, but it comes with a journal and you can update a search index incrementally. That’s what Voidtools Everything does. It’s very fast and doesn’t need a background index. (I assume modern Linux drive formats can do the same)

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 个月前

      I would argue it used to be faster since it was indexed.

      Not going to install win 11 to find out if it’s any good again. But in 7 it was.