• @Barns@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    3411 months ago

    Without opening a discussion about the conflict itself or justifying anything in the article, I will say that as someone who’s been on the receiving end of an adult throwing 5-10 pounds rocks at full strength at them, I truly think you’re underestimating the deadly damage it can cause.

    This isn’t a toddler throwing pebbles, such a rock hitting a human will break bones on contact and can absolutely kill of it hits someone’s head

    • Fazoo
      link
      fedilink
      1411 months ago

      Yeah, you have to view it like stoning. One good rock to an unprotected head is all it takes to turn the lights off.

      • @DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1411 months ago

        Civilians walking around or driving in cars? No they don’t.

        Even for the army with gear on, it will generally save their lives when hit in the right spot, but the stones will still cause injuries wherever they hit.

    • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      -611 months ago

      Oh I know rocks CAN be deadly. But so can lots of things. From the info in the article they were throwing rocks at cars, not IDF forces who are undoubtedly armoured to the teeth for greater stopping power than rocks.

      Just seems strange to shoot someone for not obeying when they aren’t directly threatening you, but the article is a bit light on actual details. Being the source that it is, I don’t think they would hesitate to highlight the IDF were defending themselves if they actually were.

      • @DoomBot5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        411 months ago

        Using a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death is much worse than possessing a deadly weapon. You think people in cars haven’t died from stone throwers before?

        • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
          link
          fedilink
          010 months ago

          I don’t understand this logic. IDF literally shooting someone is somehow less of a “use of a deadly weapon in a manner that can cause death” than throwing a stone at a car?

          I get that they deemed the person dangerous, but shooting someone for throwing a stone is a slippery slope to all sorts of things, eg. Kettled protesters who start throwing stones at riot police. Should the police just mow them all down because rocks can be deadly?

          • @DoomBot5@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            310 months ago

            Why do you keep using arguments where stones are being thrown at police/army? These stones were being thrown at unarmed, unprotected humans.

            • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
              link
              fedilink
              -110 months ago

              Stop being disingenuous. The rocks were thrown at cars. They weren’t interrupting a public stoning.

              • @DoomBot5@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                210 months ago

                Do you know how many people died from rocks thrown at cars? I’m not talking hypotheticals, I’m talking real deaths and injuries.

                • @Guntrigger@feddit.ch
                  link
                  fedilink
                  010 months ago

                  Do you? I’d wager it’s considerably lower than deaths from shootings involving figures of authority.