• Hotznplotzn
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    She was charged for attempted murder and robberies (convicted only for the latter), and the only reason why she was not tried for terrorist offences committed before the early 1990s was because a statute of limitations deadline had expired.

    Are these ‘activities’ fine if and when the person who commits them claims to be ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-capitalist’? Am I a ‘fash’ if I don’t want people to be robbed at gunpoint (and killed) just because they work in a bank or have been in the wrong place at the wrong time?

    And, if so, what exactly is the difference if such crimes are committed by a right-winger for some other abnormal ‘reasons’? What difference does it make to the victims?

    • she was wanted for robberies, not for murder. implying she killed people is a pretty fucking scummy thing to do. you’re straight up lying.

      Are these ‘activities’ fine if and when the person who commits them claims to be ‘left-wing’ and ‘anti-capitalist’?

      yes. be gay, do crime, kill Nazis and Zionists. the German billionaires are the grandchildren of literal Nazis that escaped punishment because the US and other allies didn’t want to kill rich Nazis. there’s a moral obligation steal the wages of the working class that were pilfered by Nazi billionaires. this woman is a hero and should be celebrated as such.