He’s purposefully misrepresenting the article in the tweet to encourage engagement.
The whole article says nothing more than: hey, some candidates are still pushing green energy, they’re just emphasizing the effect on jobs and cost of living rather than climate goals.
considering majority of people don’t read articles, it’s functionally giving free fodder for discourse which will be linked 5 year from now as “see, even lefties thought climate was a losing strategy”.
why on earth would you engage in this (you know why, to get new york crimes writer in your resume for podcasts) as a leftist is anyone guess
The whole article says nothing more than: hey, some candidates are still pushing green energy, they’re just emphasizing the effect on jobs and cost of living rather than climate goals.
It’s very funny how liberals discovering material reality matters to people comes as a surprise.
He’s purposefully misrepresenting the article in the tweet to encourage engagement.
The whole article says nothing more than: hey, some candidates are still pushing green energy, they’re just emphasizing the effect on jobs and cost of living rather than climate goals.
considering majority of people don’t read articles, it’s functionally giving free fodder for discourse which will be linked 5 year from now as “see, even lefties thought climate was a losing strategy”.
why on earth would you engage in this (you know why, to get new york crimes writer in your resume for podcasts) as a leftist is anyone guess
It’s very funny how liberals discovering material reality matters to people comes as a surprise.
Which is how it should be if you want to reverberate through the stone that is the American public’s skulls.
Cheers to you, Comrad, for going into the trenches and reading the article so that someone like me doesn’t have to