You’re ignoring my main point, which is that your monomaniacal posting activity in this community suggests that you see no value in hearing a from diversity of voices. AKA pluralism, which is a core principle of liberalism, of the Enlightenment, of journalism - and so something you should care about given your apparent concern about the repressive Chinese regime.
You’re respecting the letter of the rules of this community, but not their spirit.
There is no ‘conclusion’ but rather a series of statements. There is no analysis at all. The author can have
My posts here come from reliable high-quality sources citing verifiable facts.
You’re ignoring my main point, which is that your monomaniacal posting activity in this community suggests that you see no value in hearing a from diversity of voices. AKA pluralism, which is a core principle of liberalism, of the Enlightenment, of journalism - and so something you should care about given your apparent concern about the repressive Chinese regime.
You’re respecting the letter of the rules of this community, but not their spirit.