• 52fighters
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Owning things like Pocket is fine as long as each product stands on it’s own. Melding them together is what upsets their user base.

    • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      100%. And companies don’t seem to realize this. I’ll use fakespot, but there is absolutely no use for it to be an inbrowser app, and the fact that it suggests (pushes) the idea each time I use the website is just maddening. That said, I appreciate that service.

      Pocket can stay or leave. I don’t care one way or the other. I never understood its usecase.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I never understood its usecase.

        I used to use it when I was browsing the web at work. If I was reading something at the end of the day, or if it was something I didn’t want to read at work, I’d give it a pocket bookmark. Then I could pull out my phone and finish right where I left off during my train commute.

        • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Huh. Ok, cool. I just go to the address bar and enter QR to it, which triggers some search engines to generate a qr code for the following text. I, then, scan that code to my phone, and open the page on it to read later.

      • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        the fact that it suggests (pushes) the idea each time I use the website is just maddening

        I don’t think I’ve ever seen this suggestion. IDK where I clicked “STFU” but I only ever remember seeing something about it once.