db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up198arrow-down166
arrow-up132arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 1 year agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·1 year agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·1 year agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·1 year agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·1 year ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·1 year agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism