db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 months agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up197arrow-down165
arrow-up132arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 2 months agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up18arrow-down2·2 months agoAccelerationism is a religion.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down8·2 months agothis isn’t about accelerationism
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·2 months agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·2 months ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-squareNSRXN@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-22 months agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Accelerationism is a religion.
this isn’t about accelerationism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism