db0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 months agoPSAlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28linkfedilinkarrow-up199arrow-down168
arrow-up131arrow-down1imagePSAlemmy.dbzer0.comdb0@lemmy.dbzer0.comM to Flippanarchy@lemmy.dbzer0.com · 10 months agomessage-square28linkfedilink
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)linkfedilinkarrow-up11arrow-down1·10 months agoAnti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·10 months ago Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism you’re making that up
minus-square𝚗𝚜𝚛𝚇𝚗@scribe.disroot.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down5·edit-210 months agostating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism
Anti-electoralism is mathematically indistinguishable from accelerationism. It may (possibly) have a different motivation but, it results in the same outcome.
you’re making that up
stating the fact that voting is not harm reduction is not antielectoralism