• CanadaPlus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    True, and I have no special insight into Vietnamese politics. In this scenario the US is also right there, though, and is stronger than China assuming no MAD.

    Vietnam and Palau should be read as examples only.

      • CanadaPlus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That would be MAD. Unless they’re loaded with conventional warheads, in which case they’ll run out pretty early on because those missiles are expensive and the US has bottomless supplies to reply with.

        • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          “the USA, where neoliberal capitalism has hollowed out the defense contractors so much they can’t produce anywhere near enough artillery shells, has bottomless supplies and can afford more aircraft carriers than China can afford hypersonic missiles, which the USA has not even been able to successfully test.”

          pathetic cope

          • CanadaPlus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            No, they just need to afford more missiles with a similar range. Aircraft carriers might prove to be the new battleships, but that’s not the whole US military.