Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caM to Fairvote Canada@lemmy.ca · 2 days agoWe Must Have More Than 2 Choiceslemmy.caimagemessage-square27fedilinkarrow-up140arrow-down14
arrow-up136arrow-down1imageWe Must Have More Than 2 Choiceslemmy.caSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caM to Fairvote Canada@lemmy.ca · 2 days agomessage-square27fedilink
minus-squaresome_guylinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·2 days agoWe have so many choices. This makes no sense to me.
minus-squareSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·2 days agoThe is a what if scenario. No one should be stuck with 2 choices when more can be had.
minus-squareaveryrandomusername@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·1 day agoBut there are a lot more than two choices. If we went with instant runoff people would feel more comfortable voting for them.
minus-squareSunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOPMlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 day agoNo, instant run-off reinforces the 2 party system even more so. You should support the single transferable vote instead as that is ranked and proportional.
minus-squareAlolanVulpix@lemmy.caMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 day agoAlso see: A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems
We have so many choices. This makes no sense to me.
The is a what if scenario. No one should be stuck with 2 choices when more can be had.
Gotcha. Thanks!
But there are a lot more than two choices. If we went with instant runoff people would feel more comfortable voting for them.
No, instant run-off reinforces the 2 party system even more so. You should support the single transferable vote instead as that is ranked and proportional.
Also see: A Simple Guide to Electoral Systems