@LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 month agoBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1143arrow-down12
arrow-up1141arrow-down1imageBattleship reformers are unironically more fanatical and non-credible than A-10 reformerssh.itjust.works@LOCKMART@sh.itjust.works to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareFisting for FreedomMlinkfedilinkEnglish4•1 month agoPlus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
minus-square@ooterness@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoImma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun. See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
minus-squareoptionallinkfedilinkEnglish2•1 month agoWhat about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
minus-square@Droechai@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish1•edit-21 month agoWouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew Edited forgotten word to make it clearer
But does it go “brrrrrrrrrrt” ?
Scale it up.
KABOOM > brrrrrrrt
Plus the 16" guns can fire nuclear shells. It’s like the Davy Crockett’s big brother.
Imma let you finish, but a gatling gun made of 16" guns is strictly better than a regular 16" gun.
See also: This unit from Supreme Commander
What about a gattling gun using 16" guns as ammo, then?
Somebody get DARPA on this, stat.
Wouldn’t you want the Explosive* payload be nuclear rather than the shell? Seems dangerous for the crew
Edited forgotten word to make it clearer