@voidx@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish • 3 days agoDiamonds can now be created from scratch in the lab in just 15 minuteswww.earth.comexternal-linkmessage-square35fedilinkarrow-up1200arrow-down16cross-posted to: climate@slrpnk.netscience@mander.xyztechnology@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1194arrow-down1external-linkDiamonds can now be created from scratch in the lab in just 15 minuteswww.earth.com@voidx@futurology.todayM to Futurology@futurology.todayEnglish • 3 days agomessage-square35fedilinkcross-posted to: climate@slrpnk.netscience@mander.xyztechnology@lemmy.ml
minus-square@Blackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 days agoThey’re quite brittle, so probably not a window like you’re thinking. https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=15962 10mm diameter for just over £1000.
minus-squarethreelonmusketeerslinkfedilinkEnglish1•2 days ago 10mm diameter Ah, so still not quite Cullinan-scale yet. Optical quality is probably better though. I’m surprised diamonds aren’t used more for lenses. Given its high index of refraction, it seems like an ideal material.
minus-square@Blackmist@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglish2•2 days agoYeah, the optical quality seems to be the main point. I assume there’s few fields where that level of precision is worth it though. I doubt we’re about to see it on an iPhone any time soon.
They’re quite brittle, so probably not a window like you’re thinking.
https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=15962
10mm diameter for just over £1000.
Ah, so still not quite Cullinan-scale yet. Optical quality is probably better though.
I’m surprised diamonds aren’t used more for lenses. Given its high index of refraction, it seems like an ideal material.
Yeah, the optical quality seems to be the main point. I assume there’s few fields where that level of precision is worth it though. I doubt we’re about to see it on an iPhone any time soon.