• Leaflet
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    Funny, FSR2 helps me a lot but FSR3’s frame generation does nothing for me.

    • @Hazzard@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Eh, FSR3 upscaling and FSR3 frame generation are different things. I’m personally a fan of upscaling, it’s great for a sharper picture on my large 4k TV without spending a fortune on a massive GPU (I use a living room gaming PC), but not at all a fan of frame generation, as it introduces more input lag for the illusion of more frames. Not a tradeoff I’m ever willing to make, especially when VRR already does an incredible job of creating the illusion (and a degree of reality) of good performance when my framerate drops.

      • @levzzz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        Frame generation has been great in my experience (with DLSS 3) At base framerates above around 40-50 it feels like free fps

        • @Hazzard@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          12 months ago

          My issue is more with the math of it. Since it requires holding your frames until you’ve got one in reserve (can’t generate an in-between until you know what’s next), it fundamentally makes the game less responsive.

          That said, if you understand that, and like the visual smoothness of motion with more frames, then it’s super cool tech. Not every game has to be treated like it’s competitive Counter Strike, and I think it’s really cool if you like it, but it frustrates me how poorly marketed and understood the actual technology and its compromises are.