• @masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -520 days ago

      Lmao, bruh here thinks his brain evolved to process scales of millions and comprehend a nanometer.

      Are you a special unique bro different from everyone else?

      • @GenderNeutralBro
        link
        English
        220 days ago

        It’s 14,000 to 75,000, not millions.

        Microplastics are in the range of one micrometer to five millimeters, not nanometers.

        • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -320 days ago

          That changes literally nothing of what I said. Your brain did not evolve to process those scales accurately. If you think you can, that just means you’re lacking in self reflection.

          • @GenderNeutralBro
            link
            English
            5
            edit-2
            20 days ago

            Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

            More importantly, humans are capable of abstract thought. Your whole argument is specious. If you find yourself lacking the context to understand these numbers, you can easily seek context. A good starting place would be the actual paper, which is linked in OP’s article. For the lazy: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61146-4

            • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -2
              edit-2
              20 days ago

              Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

              Yeah bruh, it’s this little thing called being pedantic.

              If I say wealth inequality is crazy, no one should have 250 billion dollars, and you say ‘well actually Jeff Bezos only has 210 billion dollars’, then I will be factually incorrect and my point will still be completely valid.

              • @Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                119 days ago

                Did you really just compare the difference between 210 billion and 250 billion to the difference between 14,000 to 75,000 vs millions and one micrometer to five millimeters vs nanometers?

                • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  19 days ago

                  Yes, it’s this little thing called context, thresholds, and relative magnitude.

                  If your brain is only evolved to process numbers up to a hundred or two, then everything 10000+ is similarly processed through abstractions rather than your brain being able to directly comprehend and compare them.

                  If instead of asking a guffawing question, you actually tried to point out why my reasoning was flawed, you may have realized those basic aspects of how language and reasoning work on your own.

                  • @Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    1
                    edit-2
                    19 days ago

                    Relative magnitude, really? You’re undermining your own point by not using a representative example and then calling your example a relative magnitude to the others.

                    210 billion to 250 billion = ~19% increase

                    75,000 to a million = ~12,000% increase

                    Nanometer to micrometer = ~99,000% increase

                    Nanometer to 5 millimeters = ~499,999,900% increase