• @GenderNeutralBro
    link
    English
    220 days ago

    It’s 14,000 to 75,000, not millions.

    Microplastics are in the range of one micrometer to five millimeters, not nanometers.

    • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -320 days ago

      That changes literally nothing of what I said. Your brain did not evolve to process those scales accurately. If you think you can, that just means you’re lacking in self reflection.

      • @GenderNeutralBro
        link
        English
        5
        edit-2
        20 days ago

        Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

        More importantly, humans are capable of abstract thought. Your whole argument is specious. If you find yourself lacking the context to understand these numbers, you can easily seek context. A good starting place would be the actual paper, which is linked in OP’s article. For the lazy: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-61146-4

        • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -2
          edit-2
          20 days ago

          Being factually incorrect about literally everything you said changes nothing? Okay.

          Yeah bruh, it’s this little thing called being pedantic.

          If I say wealth inequality is crazy, no one should have 250 billion dollars, and you say ‘well actually Jeff Bezos only has 210 billion dollars’, then I will be factually incorrect and my point will still be completely valid.

          • @Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            119 days ago

            Did you really just compare the difference between 210 billion and 250 billion to the difference between 14,000 to 75,000 vs millions and one micrometer to five millimeters vs nanometers?

            • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              19 days ago

              Yes, it’s this little thing called context, thresholds, and relative magnitude.

              If your brain is only evolved to process numbers up to a hundred or two, then everything 10000+ is similarly processed through abstractions rather than your brain being able to directly comprehend and compare them.

              If instead of asking a guffawing question, you actually tried to point out why my reasoning was flawed, you may have realized those basic aspects of how language and reasoning work on your own.

              • @Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                1
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                Relative magnitude, really? You’re undermining your own point by not using a representative example and then calling your example a relative magnitude to the others.

                210 billion to 250 billion = ~19% increase

                75,000 to a million = ~12,000% increase

                Nanometer to micrometer = ~99,000% increase

                Nanometer to 5 millimeters = ~499,999,900% increase

                • @masterspace@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  119 days ago

                  Notice how all of those numbers are substantially larger or smaller, by many orders of magnitude, than a couple of hundred.

                  Are you intentionally trying to avoid understanding what I’m writing?