• @Tavarin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    51 year ago

    so as long as other have convinced them enough for them to believe it, then they haven’t broken their oath.

    • @whiskyriot
      link
      31 year ago

      I agree. Grusch could have been misled and bought into lies/misinformation. But at the very least I think HE believes it or wouldn’t be putting his career in jeopardy by reporting to Inspector Generals and testifying to Congress.

      The above poster makes it sound like he is likely to be lying about it, which I think is a weak character attack and not arguing in good faith.

      Don’t forget, along with the oral and written testimony, Grusch supposedly provided enough evidence to the ICIG to warrant an “urgent and credible” threat.