• @Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    493 months ago

    No offense to you personally, but I hate this kind of premature defeatism. Like… yeah, some people are jerks and try to take advantage of things. Put rules in place and enforce them as much as the people in charge care to.

    I know it’s strawmanning to bring this up, but people use the same argument to say "We shouldn’t have food stamps for hungry kids or welfare for needy families or subsidized housing for people without homes because people will abuse it. Yeah. Some people will, and others will suffer because of their greed. But so many more people will continue to suffer if we don’t even try because we are too scared of The Undeserving boogeyman. Not every tree will be taken advantage of, and as the sense of outreach and community grows, abuse of it will fall and it will be worth it. I guarantee it…

      • @Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        93 months ago

        That too. “I’m a fiscally conservative Republican who doesn’t believe in handouts.” Oh? How convenient that you can selfishly hoard all your money for yourself by hiding behind principle…

        • @vividspecter@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          63 months ago

          Sometimes they are even taking advantage of welfare themselves, but don’t seem to make that connection.

    • @ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      123 months ago

      I hate this kind of premature defeatism

      This is what “the tragedy of the commons” was all about in pre-Victorian England. Rich people decried the existence of land held and used by all the people of a community, claiming that it couldn’t work in practice because eventually some asshole would always take it all for themselves. Turns out they were the some asshole, seizing all the commons for themselves as private property (a process known as “enclosure”), ending many centuries of actually successful common usage of land.