kingthrillgore to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agoReddit is making sitewide protests basically impossiblewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square445fedilinkarrow-up11.28Karrow-down122cross-posted to: redditwasfun@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonereddit@lemmy.worldquarks@startrek.website
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1external-linkReddit is making sitewide protests basically impossiblewww.theverge.comkingthrillgore to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish • 3 months agomessage-square445fedilinkcross-posted to: redditwasfun@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.orgghazi@lemmy.blahaj.zonereddit@lemmy.worldquarks@startrek.website
minus-square@secret300linkEnglish1•3 months agoah the old catch 22 that is the right use of that term right?
minus-square@pyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish2•edit-23 months agoA requires B but B requires A so neither gets started. I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started. but there’s no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it’s paradoxical.
minus-square@Walk_blesseD@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglish3•3 months agoThis was the last straw for me, running Redact right now.
minus-square@bitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglish7•3 months agoI had to laugh when I got banned from a sub because I used redact.
I don’t get why people don’t just leave
because other people haven’t left yet
ah the old catch 22
that is the right use of that term right?A requires B but B requires A so neither gets started.
I think Catch 22 is A requires B but B nullifies A so A is guaranteed to not get started.
but there’s no need to be that pedantic, casually speaking. people know what you mean when you say catch 22. we could also just say it’s paradoxical.
This was the last straw for me, running Redact right now.
I had to laugh when I got banned from a sub because I used redact.