• Neuromancer
      link
      fedilink
      364 months ago

      The more disk you had, the longer it took. It walked the scsi bus which took forever. So if you had more disk. It took even longer.

      Since everything was remote, you’d have to call hands and they weren’t technical. Also no cameras since it was the 90’s.

      Now when I restart a vm or container. I panic if it’s not back up in 10 minutes.

      • @CanadaPlus
        link
        44 months ago

        Why would you design a disk driver that way?

        • Neuromancer
          link
          fedilink
          94 months ago

          It isn’t a disk driver since the OS is not loaded yet. It is the hardware identifying each disk in the SCSI chain. Not sure what else it was doing walking the bus much I know finding all the disk was the longest part.

          • @CanadaPlus
            link
            1
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Shoot, it did occur to me that might not technically be the right word.

            Still, even if you’re an engineer in the late 80’s, it seems like it would be obvious you need a way for disks to announce themselves in O(1) time. Was it just a limitation of interoperability between vendors or something?

            • Neuromancer
              link
              fedilink
              04 months ago

              I think it was just a limit of how quick everything ran back then. Also, this was an IBM system that was checked, double-checked, and triple-checked because it was a mission-critical system. IBM used to be known for quality hardware. Hard to imagine because they are such a crap company now but that was the equivalent of a google back then.