SSTF to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 1 year agoWhat inaccurate historical factoid do you just go with?message-square74fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down14
arrow-up170arrow-down1message-squareWhat inaccurate historical factoid do you just go with?SSTF to No Stupid Questions@lemmy.world • 1 year agomessage-square74fedilink
minus-square@contextual_somebody@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink4•1 year ago1.67 Meters https://www.history.com/news/napoleon-complex-short
minus-square@Oderus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•1 year agoI wonder why the height differs so much between sites?
minus-square@contextual_somebody@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink6•1 year agoUsually I’m a huge champion of Wikipedia, but my guess is someone on Wikipedia not accurately converting between archaic French inches/metric/imperial
1.67 Meters
https://www.history.com/news/napoleon-complex-short
I wonder why the height differs so much between sites?
Usually I’m a huge champion of Wikipedia, but my guess is someone on Wikipedia not accurately converting between archaic French inches/metric/imperial