• @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    14 months ago

    to advocate for cooperatives and elect officials that will help support them? With the right state sponsored incentives, cooperatives can be a great stepping stone for a peaceful transition of power giving workers ownership to the means of production. I struggle to understand how someone can argue against this idea.

    So basically the state exists in order to defend capitalism from internal and external threats, and a cooperative movement growing too big is a threat that it is going to respond to violently. Hell, union struggles led to literal battles and aerial bombings, and they only wanted better conditions working for the capitalists.

    • @save_the_humans@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Right I see. Co-ops are a threat to a capitalist that wants to exploit their workers, and if co-ops got big enough to strain the system I imagine there would be some push back from someone with money.

      But co-ops can exist outside the system so it shouldn’t matter, and theyd have the power in numbers. Cooperation among cooperatives is one of the defining principles of a cooperative. So if a housing co-op gets their food from a food co-op who gets their food from a farmers co-op and they all get there energy from an energy co-op, what is a capitalist to do? Its like a free market and if the capitalist fails, that’s just competition.

      All that would need to be done is for there to be more co-ops and more people that understand and want them to exist.

      I mean if we want to overthrow the system violently, or reject it with violence, we can but I see an alternative here if somehow people can unite on an idea. I don’t know how to do that though.

      • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        14 months ago

        But co-ops can exist outside the system

        They straight up do not exist outside the system? I dont know why you think they exist outside the system.

        • @save_the_humans@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          1
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          I mean its the goal… to avoid violent revolution. If it does need to turn to that though, then what will be there to replace capitalism?

          Its literally an alternative where workers own the means of production. How is that not outside the system? They already exist in pockets around the world.

          • @OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            14 months ago

            Its literally an alternative where workers own the means of production. How is that not outside the system?

            Because capitalism isn’t just individual companies, it is also the state, financial systems, markets, etc. If two out of 5 production systems become cooperatives the owners of the last 3 are gonna instruct the police to restore capitalist control to the two.