• XNX
    link
    fedilink
    -245 months ago

    How does the make it non free from corporate influence. The hate boner towards discord is getting ridiculous sometimes. Yeah it sucks to use a repo thats not googleable and not open source bur discord is an objectively better user experience than matrix

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      145 months ago

      How does the make it non free from corporate influence.

      Do they require Discord and depend on it? Yes.
      Is Discord corporate? Yes.
      Are they then still free from corporate influence? Nope. H Simply put, if Discord suddenly implemented weird rules the Ladybird devs would have to comply with, they’d simply have to follow suit or break their main communication channel.

    • youmaynotknow
      link
      fedilink
      135 months ago

      We see these things differently. I would argue that Matrix clients are better organized than Discord. That said, not only is Discord a privacy nightmare, but ilthe interface is only pseudo-organized at best.

      • @toastal@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        15 months ago

        All the Matrix clients are buggy using far too many resources & the protocol is slow as balls about joining new rooms while being wasteful about data duplication for throwaway bits of text/multimedia. I don’t think eventual consistency is the right model for chat & following Slack & Discord’s model is the way.

        • @OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Slack & Discord both use eventual consistency?

          Btw I agree with you that Discord is better UX than Matrix, but your comment doesn’t make much sense

          • @toastal@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Sorry for clarity. The eventual consistency model is a result of wanting decentralization for Slack/Telegram/Discord’s design of thinking the entire history needs to be saved for chat rather than seen as ephemeral (which allows for better search & resilience, but at a major cost to storage, but also a knock-on effect of folks treating chat as permanent which is why we have huge, cut-off information silos on these chat platforms that the rest of the net can’t index & often trawling the search is difficult so the repeated questions/answers are common since a simple web search doesn’t yield good results). When you take away the concept that all text & attachments need to be seen from origin til the end of time, you would never bother in all the work of cloning the entire history & reassembling it on every server listening to the conversation. …Which is why many chat protocols forgo the more then enough history to keep you up to speed with a conversation & structured forums + feeds used to be the primary way to ask questions & make announcements (where simple programs could parse the data instead of needing gobs of natural language processing for chat soup when it is pulling multiple duties).

    • Fonzie!
      link
      fedilink
      65 months ago

      How does the make it non free from corporate influence.

      Do they require Discord and depend on it? Yes.
      Is Discord corporate? Yes.
      Are they then still free from corporate influence? Nope.

      Simply put, if Discord suddenly implemented weird rules the Ladybird devs would have to comply with, they’d simply have to follow suit or break their main communication channel.