• @yannic@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    No port forwarding, though. Some old guides still list them as having that capability, so I try to mention it frequently.

      • @filcuk@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        2
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Possibly if one might want to be able to access a service behind the VPN without having a load balancer / reverse proxy?

      • @yannic@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        25 months ago

        I don’t see why having options are turn-offs except maybe for those who provide said options.

        • @DannyMac@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          15 months ago

          I don’t understand. I mean I see why not having port forwarding would turn someone off from going with Mullvad, but I understand Mullvad’s rationale for doing so.

          • @yannic@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I understand their decision to stop offering it, too, especially if I were in their position as a service provider. I still like the feature as a consumer.