As soon as Apple announced its plans to inject generative AI into the iPhone, it was as good as official: The technology is now all but unavoidable. Large language models will soon lurk on most of the world’s smartphones, generating images and text in messaging and email apps. AI has already colonized web search, appearing in Google and Bing. OpenAI, the $80 billion start-up that has partnered with Apple and Microsoft, feels ubiquitous; the auto-generated products of its ChatGPTs and DALL-Es are everywhere. And for a growing number of consumers, that’s a problem.

Rarely has a technology risen—or been forced—into prominence amid such controversy and consumer anxiety. Certainly, some Americans are excited about AI, though a majority said in a recent survey, for instance, that they are concerned AI will increase unemployment; in another, three out of four said they believe it will be abused to interfere with the upcoming presidential election. And many AI products have failed to impress. The launch of Google’s “AI Overview” was a disaster; the search giant’s new bot cheerfully told users to add glue to pizza and that potentially poisonous mushrooms were safe to eat. Meanwhile, OpenAI has been mired in scandal, incensing former employees with a controversial nondisclosure agreement and allegedly ripping off one of the world’s most famous actors for a voice-assistant product. Thus far, much of the resistance to the spread of AI has come from watchdog groups, concerned citizens, and creators worried about their livelihood. Now a consumer backlash to the technology has begun to unfold as well—so much so that a market has sprung up to capitalize on it.


Obligatory “fuck 99.9999% of all AI use-cases, the people who make them, and the techbros that push them.”

  • @CanadaPlus
    link
    3514 days ago

    It will fail. Downvote me if you must, but AI generated erotica is just as here as machine-woven textiles.

        • @Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          113 days ago

          Bonus trivia, sometimes you may see a downvote on a Beehaw post. As far as I understand the system, that’s because someone on your server downvoted the thing. The system then sends it off to Beehaw to be recorded on the “real” post and Beehaw just doesn’t apply it.

          • @CanadaPlus
            link
            112 days ago

            Can confirm. My server has had federation issues, and when that has happened you can still post or vote on outside communities, but it’s not mirrored anywhere else.

            • @CanadaPlus
              link
              1
              edit-2
              12 days ago

              I think that’s standard, actually. I can always do it at least.

    • @Kedly@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      313 days ago

      Which is why the term Luddite has never been more accurate than since it first started getting associated with being behind on technological progress

      • @uis@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        813 days ago

        Luddites aren’t against technological progress, they are against social regress.

        • @CanadaPlus
          link
          112 days ago

          I have never, ever heard this definition of Luddite.

        • @Kedly@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          113 days ago

          Pretty sure social norms are better now than they were back when Luddites got their name associated with being against technological progress

      • @CanadaPlus
        link
        212 days ago

        Yes, that wasn’t a random example for anyone OOTL. The thing the OG Luddites would do is break into factories and smash mechanical looms. They wanted to keep doing it the medieval way where you’re just crossing threads by hand over and over again, because “muh jerbs”.