• @shadowtofu@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1720 days ago

        Without UEFI, the boot process is different for each device, requires a custom boot loader, or at least explicit support by the operating system. Is your laptop going to be supported by the distribution you want to use? What about in 5 or 10 years? With UEFI, the boot process is standardized, so it should just work.

        • @mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          120 days ago

          Oh yeah but well instead of using the UEFI we probably should include libreboot or coreboot. But uefi is better than nothing but since its tuxedo we should expect some libreboot

          • @TCB13@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            19 days ago

            Not “oh yeah” that’s a major concern and the biggest issue with ARM adoption. SBCs and ARM tablets are a mess when it comes to Linux support and one of the biggest reasons for it is the lack of an UEFI. Long term support as said is another very big concern, if you take any x86 box new or old things will work predictably because the OS doesn’t need to know the details of the boot process / low level hardware control.

          • bruhduh
            link
            fedilink
            119 days ago

            You mean tianocore payload of coreboot/libreboot? That’s uefi

              • bruhduh
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                19 days ago

                That it’s open source, vendor uefi is rarely open source, plus coreboot have many other payloads like seabios, uboot, grub

      • bruhduh
        link
        fedilink
        1
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        Because how do you install Linux without ability to choose boot from USB (changing boot order)