I guess they’re giving up on convincing people to download their launcher.

  • @zikk_transport2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    207
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Not gonna play them if they include their launcher after game is started from Steam lol.

    EDIT: I am very happy to hear that everyone hates them. EA as well as Rockstar has shown that their launchers are shit. On Steam Deck EA games often fail to start at all due to EA launcher updates, and Rockstar launcher takes around 3-5 minutes to start a fucking game (which should start instantly).

    • elouboub
      link
      fedilink
      481 year ago

      I don’t understand what the point of a blizzard launcher is - steam is already a launcher.

          • @sheepyowl
            link
            English
            21 year ago

            The games are coming to Steam. Even if the launcher is there, Steam still gets the 30%

            • @thann@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              21 year ago

              IDK what your comment is about, but its not a coincidence the first blizz game coming to steam is free to play,

              • @pory@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                In-app purchases, mtx, DLC, and premium currency are also subject to Valve tax for games that are on Steam. Free to play means “enough people pay $200+ that we can get away with not selling it for $50”, putting it on Steam still means Valve gets a piece of the pie.

      • @Mongostein@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        7
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The Battle.net launcher pre-dates Steam though, doesn’t it?

        Edit: guess not. Steam came out in 2003. I hadn’t heard of it until well after the Battle.net launcher came out in 2013. 🤷🏻‍♂️

        • @beefcat@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          221 year ago

          Battle.net actually launched in 1996, though the client as it existed back then would hardly be recognizable as a launcher/storefront today. The modern client launched in 2009.

    • @beefcat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      331 year ago

      Mike Ybarra confirmed on the bird site that these games will launch directly through Steam, no bundled launcher nonsense.

    • @rockerface@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 year ago

      Battle.net launcher can literally be closed after the game is running. It even has a setting to automatically do so. Why would they pull this sort of bullshit, I have no idea

    • Kamek
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11 year ago

      Do we know if it’ll work this way ? It sounds so stupid but I wouldn’t put it past them

      • @zikk_transport2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        11 year ago

        Pretty sure it either allows to login within game, or launches their own (micro?) launcher first, where you have to login with Blizzard account and then starts the game.

        Pretty much all “steam games” that are primarily available elsewhere run this way using mini launchers…

    • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -41 year ago

      On Steam Deck EA games often fail to start at all due to EA launcher updates, and Rockstar launcher takes around 3-5 minutes to start a fucking game (which should start instantly).

      I mean, this sounds suspiciously like something a company that makes the device that also owns and runs the biggest digital game store might do intentionally.

      • Semperverus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Except its not. Valve has gone out of their way to make sure other peoples’ games and launchers work, even if they’re not selling directly through Steam. Look at the Proton patch notes if you’re not just being a conspiratorial asshole and actually care about the facts.