• @dartanjinn@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    541 year ago

    TL;DR: ChromeOS is Linux but it’s not Linux but it’s a Linux so count it as a Linux but not Linux. Half.

    • @lemming934
      link
      English
      20
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess this is a situation where the proper name of GNU / Linux is useful

      Edit: Chrome OS is is a GNU/ Linux and a couple of “proper” Linuxes are not.

      • Phrodo_00
        link
        fedilink
        151 year ago

        As far as I know, ChromeOS is also GNU/Linux (It uses full glibc, includes gnu utils and bash), so not so much.

        • NaN
          link
          fedilink
          English
          41 year ago

          They mention this in the article.

          In fact, they never say it’s not Linux. The summary would be more like: “ChromeOS should be counted among desktop Linux, because it has the same basis as any other GNU/Linux distribution, unlike Android. Here are the dumb reasons I think people would argue against this.”

        • @fulano@lemmy.eco.br
          link
          fedilink
          2
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Such definitions are becoming more and more complicated. I think we should standardize a name for the family of systems we use, or it will become uglier and uglier.

          Recently, I had to write an academic work in the area, and an entire section was dedicated to explaining this controversy and defining what kind of system I was talking about, so that the work is reproducible.

      • @atlasraven31@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        You see sometimes Linux is not Linux and sometimes it is. Naturally, we can’t count non-Linux as Linux but sometimes we can count Linux as non-Linux.