“we have Dahir insaat at home” ass monorail

  • flan [they/them]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    122 months ago

    if it’s on one rail you could have them pass each other without needing to build a second set of tracks or relying on sidings to exist

    • Maoo [none/use name]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      The concept art shows both rails being used by a single car but still having the balancing problem. Worst of both worlds.

        • Maoo [none/use name]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          32 months ago

          Oh God that’s even worse. Guaranteed collisions via an unnecessary slow-moving part that is assumed to always function correctly.

          Rail comes in pairs already so that you only have to build one engineered area, tunnel, bridge, etc. This is a bazinga idea.

          • Chronicon [they/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            if you read the article, the bar is a safety mechanism for the prototype/testing stage and would not be in place on the production run.

            these test models are equipped with extendible “catching devices” that keep them from tipping over in the event of a mishap

            • Maoo [none/use name]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 month ago

              Yes I read the article and that ambiguous language doesn’t challenge what I said.

              This is a really bad idea. The kind cooked up by academic transportation grifters looking to take a pile of money from the government to do a bad idea with the right buzzwords. This is how the bazinga industrial complex works.