• @Trent@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        37 months ago

        True. It was a lot shorter than typing “This is sourced, but RT is the media arm of the Kremlin and about as reliable as the National Enquirer. And definitely shouldn’t be trusted when russia stands to directly gain from painting ukraine as a bunch of terrorists. Especially when a known terrorist group has already said they did it.” though. YMMV.

        • Nakoichi [they/them]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          97 months ago

          The only sources you would accept are shit from CIA cutouts and pro western media anyway so what is the point?

          • @CanadaPlus
            link
            27 months ago

            There isn’t. Either most people have bought into a conspiracy theory or you have. It makes communication kind of pointless.

            • Nakoichi [they/them]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              67 months ago

              Examining the preponderance of evidence and coming to the most reasonable conclusion isn’t a conspiracy theory bud.

              • @CanadaPlus
                link
                27 months ago

                When I said “either or”, I really meant it.

          • @Trent@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -17 months ago

            Not sure, you’re the one commenting at me, not the other way around. In any case, I’m out. Best of luck convincing people with RT though.

          • Keith
            link
            fedilink
            -27 months ago

            What? No, the reason RT is bad is because it’s specifically Russian government bad. It’s like Qatar and Al-Jazeera, but even less distance.

            The problem is not that RT is not CIA controlled or that it’s not pro western, it’s that it’s literally one of the parties involved.