• 222 Posts
  • 3.32K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 15th, 2024

help-circle







  • I love me a good smoked Texas brisket, but god damn, acquiring and then babysitting a smoker for an entire night, all to land at “really quite decent” is my definition of diminishing returns.

    If I ever accidentally acquire a raw brisket, I’ll turn in my Texas card (no great loss these days) and put that fucker in the oven with some foil and liquid smoke. Meantime, I’ll stop by the HEB sometimes, or a better place when we have out of town guests.






  • Yeah. I don’t think this is too hard to parse, nor is it likely to be some cogent political protest.

    1. New flat surface attracts graffiti.
    2. Within a short time, someone else breaks the glass to get access to the balls because they can’t or won’t use the app.

    There could easily be an element of “fuck that app,” but the “reward” here is access to a basketball while at the park. I think Occam’s razor is an appropriate initial framework.

    It also looks like the city was prudent and avoided a major investment of tax money.


  • It doesn’t get a lot of play, because it’s kind of obtuse, but he has extremely strong beliefs; they’re just ones that don’t preclude him saying this stuff to fool investors. There were a few pieces that have been written about it, and they flared up again after his weird antichrist lectures last year.

    The article hints at it it, but basically, he subscribes/contributes to an extreme variant of an obscure religion-adjacent philosophy that posits that the social stability benefits of an authoritarian Christian monoculture, preferably over the whole world due to some quirks of Christian theology, but certainly at least in the parts of the world where Christianity is a majority religion, are so amazing that they’re worth pretending that it’s all actually factually true, and that a surveillance state to preserve harmony (and, surprise side effect, it also locks in the power of the elites who establish it all!) is completely acceptable. Theoretically the Christianity part is optional, but there is a lot of risk inherent in not relying on the historical social glue.

    To him, seeking this is for the good of humankind. Anything that opposes any of it with any sort of sway, and especially from a Christian context, can be fairly called an antichrist. It’s some serious Leto II God Emperor of Dune shit.



  • So look, this SCOTUS is a piece of shit SCOTUS that subscribes to some bad judicial philosophies that are simultaneously ivory tower unrealistic and lazy and magically inure to the benefit of these currently in power. That last part is why the Republicans love them.

    That said, that all came up feeling like they were honest mediators of a complex system, and that they’re trying to bring systemic thinking to a messy body of case law. Trump didn’t have the political capital in his first term to pick true loyalists and sycophants like some of the incompetent nonentities he appointed to lower courts. He had promised to pick from the Federalist Society’s list, so he did.

    Because of that, Trump only gets what he wants the 80-ish percent of the time his (generally rather weak) legal staffs can come up with a halfway cogent argument that works with the reflexive and regressive “originalist” and “textualist” frameworks the conservative majority fancies themselves to be following logically. The other twenty percent, it’s just so obviously an unconstitutional power grab that they can’t even get this court to agree to it. Meanwhile of course, the administration has been doing whatever it wants, but that’s a slightly different issue.