
Be careful with how you consider this article, it doesn’t have as much confirmation bias as the title would lead you to believe.
There are a few nuggets in this article that I think should be considered:
- The open source projects that were tested have an average age of 10 years, the article states that AI code assistance is better for new projects and less efficient when used with existing projects.
- The projects used have strict style guidelines.
- The developers were very well versed on their projects, meaning they were extremely efficient and code changes.
- the article itself claims that AI is probably better utilized by newer developers. Of course experienced devs who have years tied into their projects are going to be very well equipped to execute on their projects.
At the beginning:
I’m excited to see how they develop Radagast, he’s one of my favorite characters.
In Moria:
Another dwarven mine? Talk about a plot rehash. Is there going to be a big bad in this one too?
Why doesn’t Frodo just use the ring most of the time to hide like Bilbo did?
When they introduce Legolas:
He was in the prequels, I really liked his romantic story arc.
Near the End of the Two Towers:
This one felt long in the tooth. Did they really have to keep all of that character building?
Near the end of ROTK:
How long was this journey? It took Bilbo decades to be seduced by the ring. You’re telling me it overpowered Frodo in just a few weeks? Why didn’t they just give the ring to Sam? He seems better equipped to handle it. I’ll tell you why. Nepotism.
When they encounter the giant spiders - they had these in the prequel too.
You’re telling me all this time it’s a ghost army that wins this war?