og vi æder allesammen maddingen.
Og det hjælper ikke at cirka alle medier har travlt med at sanewashe Muskolini og hans orangutang.
og vi æder allesammen maddingen.
Og det hjælper ikke at cirka alle medier har travlt med at sanewashe Muskolini og hans orangutang.
It’s worse than that, the first safety inspection is after four years, not six.
It doesn’t matter.
It REALLY doesn’t matter.
Best way I saw it expressed: If you did something that was NOT a nazi salute, but other people perceived it as a nazi salute, you would IMMEDIATELY apologise and walk it back. Given that Muskolini has not done that, he did indeed do a nazi salute.
Here’s one for less than 4 USD. I imagine 150 mm in length would be sufficient.
Wikipedia link (to the Peeping Tom section).
With a useful shortcut at isup.me
They know about it; doesn’t mean they actually did anything to counter it.
The issue is not ammonia (at least not when it comes to urine) but rather urea, which also reacts with hypochlorite to create chloramines.
Der er også her: https://dataforsyningen.dk/map omend det måske kræver lidt klippe-klistre i noget billedredigeringssoftware.
Kubuntu on my desktop, I prefer KDE as a DE and I’m used to the Debian ecosystem.
Linux Mint on my relatively low powered laptop that I rarely use.
Debian stable on my media server.
Obligatory reference to tulip mania: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania
Eller havde forældrene noget kokain de skulle af med, som det plejer at være med disse historier i USA?
Also, impeachment. One would like to think that even today, a president-through-killing-the-president-while-being-vice-president would be impeached and removed by congress, but who knows.
I’m a man and I pee sitting down because:
it’s more comfortable
Agreed, I will generally sit down.
It’s solely a matter of comfort and/or convenience:
Thank you for the corrections, I think I maybe skimmed the text back when it went through the EP, so I was mostly going from (poor) memory.
My understanding is that this would allow for lawsuits along the lines of “Your poorly written software caused [our business to lose this giant contract|thousands of consumers left with bricked devices|my washing machine to eat my dog]. Now pay up!”
Essentially, software vendors (vendor being the operative word here) would become liable for damage caused by their faulty products, just like manufacturers of air compressors or toys or fireworks.
Indeed, Poul-Henning Kamp of bikeshed and BSD fame got a nice little discussion thread started yesterday over on Mastodon: https://mastodon.social/@bsdphk@fosstodon.org/113317528662477344
Yeah, I’m assuming developers in the big software companies are donning lifejackets due to the amount of palm sweat from the C-suites.
What the vast majority of people would probably think of when they hear the word ‘fire’ is actually flames; flames are quite simply particles emitting light.
For an everyday example, take a campfire: The wood logs you see burning are at such a high temperature that they give off methanol (and other flammable chemicals), which is most of what’s burning. Apart from the methanol being driven off of the wood, there will be other chemical compounds and/or larger clumps of more-or-less-burned wood that will be carried off. These larger clumps in particular, while very small, are nonetheless large and hot enough to start emitting light in the visual spectrum. This is essentially what a flame is: Particles emitting light.
Fire in and of itself is quite simply rapid oxidation in the presence of oxygen.
The above is, arguably, a gross oversimplification.
TLDR: Flames are particles, fire is combustion.