One is a guy that got elected even though everyone knew he was a rapist and a grifter, the other is the richest man in Earth. If it’s real, they won’t suffer any consequences.
This feud might look fake or too dumb to be true, but Trump showed us in many occasions that he is, indeed, that stupid. I believe the feud is real, it’s just reality that I’m unsure of these days.
Yep. When he talked about buying Twitter, the courts took him to his word and forced him to proceed. The US media might not have the same power as the courts, but t’s a pity they don’t attack him more.
Oh come on. Saying “Without me, he would have lost” if far from admitting he rigged the election. If he did, an admission would need to be more specific. That being said, Musk is a Nazi incel POS.
Every once in a while, some party leader promises to implement proportional representation once elected, gets elected, and realises proportional representation never benefits the party that got the majority so they forget about it.
Tldr: attacking Ukraine was a mistake because it had Sweden and Finland join NATO and Putin underestimated Ukrainians badassery.
I would say this is normal in a society where people trust each other.
“Championing the status quo” is not how I would describe what Republicans are doing right now.
Aren’t there primaries for the Dems?
I’m guessing librarians know how to read more than many other categories of federal workers.
Those are two different problems.
Years and years of politicians moving the goalposts further right, letting the rich get richer, allowing more money into politics and disenfranching voters is not something you reverse in a single election, and it won’t change until ordinary people get into politics more and at every level.
But if you vote for Trump or abstain from voting, you’re encouraging it.
“no taxation without representation”
Maybe it is, but could we stop saying this? Politics shouldn’t be analyzed from a psychological perspective. It’s a social phenomena, not a cognitive one. Fascism shouldn’t be excused or explained, it should be fought.
I think his top priority was to avoid confrontation. He has experience with dumb politicians from his time at the bank of England.
Carney had to use a word Trump understands.
But remember folks, calling this a genocide is antisemitic.
They’re more afraid of MAGA than they’re afraid of ordinary citizens. Nothing will change until it’s the other way around.
You know what, at this point I’m starting to believe United Healthcare’s CEO wasn’t even killed, it’s a setup. Think about it: the guy was divorced, probably with large sums to pay each month for his ex-wife and children who didn’t like him. He made decisions that killed people, he knew about growing anti-healtcare / anti-billionaire sentiment in the US and felt his life was at risk. What better plan than faking your own death, especially in a high profile case like this when you’re guaranteed that NYPD would frame someone who would take all the attention away from you while you’re quietly fleeing the country. 4d chess right there.
I agree with your point, I’m not really convinced he’s the shooter but the general feeling I have, from my limited knowledge of how the police, the judicial system and murderers work, the pictures that everyone saw and all, is that there’s a real possibility he’s the shooter. But of course we have to let the courts decide.
I’m just tired of everyone saying he didn’t do it based on nothing more than anecdotal evidence and a general hatred for anything that looks like a cop.
I’m old enough to have known a time when online discussion was mostly rational and respectful, and it bothers me how it has slowly become so polarized and emotional.
Dude had a burnout before it was cool.