Or OpenSUSE kalpa

Problem with FOSS movement happened is not all parts are self sustainable. Which leads to market fit revenue system which is basically selling data as of now. Hope this changes in future.

Probably Nextcloud

LinuxMint’s cinnamon is there

It’s spigen case. Logo is sticker on case

Thanks for correcting

Please suggest how it can be more scary. I was thinking about adding compulsory steps/procedure/documentation for reproductible builds of binary/binaries alongside source code !?

OpenSUSE Aeon

Can this be circumvated saying it’s distribution rather than OS ? 🤠

Hi, more can be explained by author [ https://mastodon.bsd.cafe/@mpeterma ]

But I use ai to write everything online 😀 how will they identify then? 😂

Check https://bazzite.gg/

This is exactly why some of us prefer the sanity of NetBSD. Besides monoculture is bad for anything.

Corporate sponsorship for GPL FOSS os will be difficult for mobile devices as they don’t see value in return. They will probably go for MIT or BSD system in future

I like LinuxMint’s MATE theme rather than default one of gnome2

Then it’s equivalent to humans 😂

License’s focus is not vibe coding devs but in general FOSS devs but current GPL licenses doesn’t protect them from A.I. scrapping their work. This one I wish will protect their works against non FOSS LLM/A.I. models leeching their work.

Being too restrictive is international. Also I think if organisation using internally it’s difficult to enforce this specific term but it will keep them away of they are not intentional about releasing source code.

Looking forward to comment.

Yes but most people want this services easily available which mobile apps alternative not available so they go for these.