Not as of yesterday, no.

And that’s fine, I certainly have no shortage of things to occupy my time, I’d just hoped to be able to help make the SDF even more awesome :)

I’m giving up on this Lemmy FWIW. I signed up over at lemmy.ml

I could be wrong but I think this is a general issue within the SDF. It’s an incredible organization and I value my membership in it very highly but I wish it were easier to pitch in and volunteer to make things better.

I think I’ll give lemmy.ml a shot. It’s run by the Lemmy developers so seems like chances are good it’ll continue to function properly :)

Ah well, we live in an imperfect world. I’m grateful for them in any case! :)

So it’s interesting reading all the folks talking about permacomputing and the like.

And I think there’s merit to keeping those architectures around.

But let’s turn this on its head, shall we? Where do we get the people who still have that hardware who are willing to actively take part in Linux kernel development?

Like, to become facile enough with the process, tools and codebase to be able to bear the load of writing new security patches as vulnerabilities are found?

It’s a hard problem. The number of people actively contributing to Linux is large in aggregate but VANISHINGLY small when it comes to any particular area of interest.

Actually, that’s how I sent it!

scp resume.pdf feoh@sdf.org:~ and then Attach file from Pine :)

Well, I sent an application email with my resume and the best proposal I could think of to volunteer@ a couple weeks back. We’ll see what happens I guess :)

Ooh thanks for the link that’s super helpful!

OK so I’m trying to parse this one and having a bit of trouble.

BigTech is being evil so you’re self hosting to be more self reliant? Check! That one makes sense. BigTech is being evil so… Piracy? :)

I don’t actually have any moral problem with people stealing most media other than that in our current craptastic system the funds to drive the creation of said media need to come from somewhere, I’m just wondering about the logic :)

I don’t think Pascal is clunky! I think it represents a point on the evolution of programming languages and is still well loved by a LOT of people! Just google Free Pascal or Lazarus Pascal.

The back catalog is amazing too. They’ve interviewed SO MANY amazing luminaries from the Atari’s past and present.

I love how much modern computing culture has its roots in the good old Amiga, and folks who didn’t own one are totally clueless about it.

Perhaps a good opportunity to fix/improve/redo that area? I don’t know if that would be a violation of any community rules.

One could, but I would argue that this idea pre-supposed a very ascetic class of programmer, and that depending on one’s goals in learning how to program, recursion can be a useful concept but saying it should be the one litmus test for any learning platforms seems highly questionable to me.

Are there any off the shelf available 68K based computers these days? I wasn’t aware of one but that would be cool :)

AMIGA 2023!!! :)

Or maybe there are people who find working in low powered environments that behave a certain way, more like computers did in the 80s enjoyable.

It’s not about boomers or what’s powerful and what’s not. Some things are just for fun and that’s all the justification they need IMO.

Also, how would that ‘weirdness’ impact using the device in a teaching context?

What would you like to see instead? Z80? Something else?

Kinda hard to say for sure, could it also be purposeful on the part of the owner?

Seems crazy I know but stranger things have happened!

I don’t know if it has that feature yet. Maybe go to the bug tracker and see if someone’s already filed an issue you can +1?

Oh I totally agree. The Lua idioms can be confusing and the documentation ecosystem is currently in a place where if you already know Lua well it’s incredibly helpful, but bridging the gap for beginners is a challenge - one worth embracing!

It’s not a distribution.

It’s a bag of Lua files you can use to get started.

Also, it’s not for you :) Users who know enough to hold such opinions aren’t the target audience.