I do like serifs at least. Mostly because I hate not being able to tell Weird Al from Weird AI.

She’s DSA, which increases the odds of decent policies and the writeup in the article sounds encouraging to me.

I like that their suffix which apparently means ‘god’ is crom

My favorite iteration of MySpace was the first one. No, not the social network with my friend Tom, I mean before that.

The domain was owned by a company that had jumped on the bandwagon of offering online file storage, that thing which is now called cloud storage. Much like OneDrive or Google Drive, etc.

MySpace offered 300MB for free, which was the largest I found at the time. Also the name actually made sense.

Upvoted, but I only partly agree. The way things are now you can order takeout from local small businesses, and there won’t be consistent quality or speed or prices, but they’re not a huge corporate machine. (At least at the endpoints). A big conglomerate moving into the space may put most of the local ones under.

No sense of scale in this one, the penny is a shocking size reference.

Brazzers

You already do. As mentioned in the comments, X-Files had a crossover with Cops, which is our universe.

Sounds like a powerful combination.

KDE Connect

Female presenting legs.

Battery battery battery 30 battery. 🙁

Battery battery 72 battery! (battery 2020!)

“I.C. Weiner? Aw, crud.”

“Therrrre’s a bathroom on the right!”

Apparently so.

(Other sources are saying catering truck instead of container, so [shrug])

They’ve been doing it for decades.

Why don’t they just automatically clear the time if it’s a small amount and it hasn’t been used in much more time than is left?

A lot if it’s butter or pop tarts. Not much for most other things.

It’s a system where the two highest in the primary to the general, regardless of party. Sounds good on paper but it’s still possible for the vote on one side to be split, similar to the spoiler effect, resulting in two of the weaker party winning when there are nearly dozens of candidates of the stronger parties sharing the votes.

And yeah, we need better elections (and not Ranked Choice either. Score or Approval are simple to explain and don’t have those effects where you can help someone you don’t want to win by voting for those you do)

It’s my personal opinion that a lot of the support for Ranked Choice specifically is astroturfing from groups that don’t want real change. It’s nearly as bad as First Past the Post and is still subject to spoiler effects for example. Also too confusing for voters to trust.

My preferences are for approval or score voting. With those there isn’t a situation where voting for someone you want increases odds for someone you don’t.