You should just avoid taking seriously the politics of these punk scene friends of yours. They’re clearly just doing it for aesthetic. They’re not serious about their ideology, so you need not worry about them in a serious sense.
Someone who studies even cursory Marxism, Anarchism, or any even remotely-anticapitalist position simply doesn’t have issues conflating Palestine and Ukraine.
i just want you to know that you’re on my top 3 best shapebear poster list of all time
I live in Pennsylvania. I know it’s convenient for scratched liberals to believe everyone that criticizes your fucked-up worldview is some Russian Ork Bot, but what you’re actually doing is signaling your bigotry to the world and admitting you can’t handle ideas without resorting to fantasy.
Naomi Klein is a liberal slop generator. Your heroes are pathetic. Read a book that criticizes capitalism written by a Marxist if you want a semblance of what actual leftists think about these topics. Not some progressive liberal clown.
I made the argument in my original comment. I don’t need to repeat myself.
What am I educating myself on? This is liberal slop. It is literal anticommunist bullshit. The author is a random inconsequential liberal uninterested in forming coherent criticisms of capitalism. Did I stutter?
Liberal slop. Lists all this “fascism” (the author does not seem to understand the term) and “authoritarianism” (a horseshit self-own by liberals) but fails to mention the United States’ role as leader in the worldwide reactionary movement. Mentions all these horrible things but zero mention of capitalism’s role in societal decline.
Chauvinistic, useless writing. The people celebrating this book are pathetic.
There it is, folks. The ramblings of a selfish person who doesn’t understand that this system is in place to help them. Ignorant as hell.
Hey, I tried. Good luck.
The cope in this thread is out of this world.
That is, in fact, not what they said. You’ve done a shit-tier straw man, but why? Their point was that the federal pressure was being used to deflect organizational and nepotism issues. Not that it doesn’t exist at all.
The way you’ve mischaracterized this person’s post has, in at least my mind, completely undermined your entire premise. You should consider deleting this reply.
Removed by mod
Shut the fuck up, cretin.
I can’t imagine living like this. You see a handful of sentences and because you’re too stupid to imagine someone actually writing it without AI, it must have been an LLM.
What if I told you this exact literary structure of “x not y” has been used since the advent of speech? And that pre-LLMs, you would not have batted an eye at this.
They’re describing the idea that the projects that Graphene is built atop and alongside of all use AI. That even if tomorrow it was decided to not allow any AI-generated code, due to the nature of being downstream, avoiding its inclusion in all capacities is actually impossible.
There is not a hint of peer pressure in this snippet. And if you knew Graphene’s history, you’d realize how absurd of a statement it is to accuse them of being peer pressured. They regularly do random shit and tell critics to get bent.
With that said, I would of course prefer they don’t accept any AI-generated code at all, but quite frankly it’s a bit bizarre of an ask in 2026 given the game Graphene plays with cutting edge development’s intersection with privacy tools.
Trust me, nobody trusts you.
Hank Hill would not have physically survived this encounter. May Allah have mercy on that man’s soul.
Can we get some juicy examples, OP?
Removed by mod