I suppose the point is that you should read the article before commenting on a discussion thread about the article. Misinformation is rampant and willful ignorance in propogating it is not very ethical.

Anything can be a diplomatic pouch, if you’re brave enough

It doesn’t look AI at first glance, the dudes are too out of focus. What makes you say it’s AI?

You clearly didn’t read the article.

GOP: “Okay, let’s dismantle HIPAA next!”

Right, now do female employment rate. 57% in the US vs 13% in Iran. What good is having a higher education if you’re then expected to sit at home while your husband remains the only breadwinner? This post is just cherry picked propaganda.

The same people who overwhelmingly voted this shitshow into power?

In another post it was helpfully pointed out that the professor in question also believes in the illuminati and other secret cabals controlling society. Take that as you will.

I thought it was quite clear. Verifying your age with an alcohol purchase receipt is a dumb idea for a large variety of reasons, including ease of acquiring one, ease of copying images, ease of printing one yourself and the cumulative ease of doing all this without an actual adult willingly involved in your scheme. It’s is not nearly as fool proof as verifying government ID.

Of course, I’m against all invasive forms of age verification. Doesn’t mean I’m going to advocate for a rally bad alternative either.

At the very least, it reflects on his own relationships with other women.

Much more so than passports or other identity documents. Come on, man, what point are you actually arguing here?

One requires an adult participant, one doesn’t.

You could probably pick up a receipt from alcohol purchase from the ground outside any liquor store…

You are being insufferable. Cherry picking terms to support your nebulous narrative all so you can feel smug about leftist politicians and redditors. When Trump denies you your vote and ICE picks up your neighbors, who will you “No true Scotsman” then?

Context chosen by op.

Now explain why you think that’s relevant to the article you commented on.

8 don’t know where you live, but over here (European country) I can easily see 5 people on TikTok when I’m on the train.

If only they told us the IOC so the title can actually be followed up on

Do you think this is about people disagreeing with their contents? That seems like a strawman. People disagree with one specific religion’s doctrine being forced onto students.

But, since you asked, I could definitely do without these:

• I am the Lord thy God. Thou shall not have strange gods before Me.
• Thou shall not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain.
• Remember to keep holy the Lord’s day.
• Thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s wife. (seems a bit male-focused)

How so?