
But I switched to paper straws!
‘Aurenkin’ is not in the pleasers file. This incident will be reported.
Yeah, but what will impress Jodie Foster?
… And then I said: That’s not Qwen2-5.2B-Instruct.gguf - that’s my waifu!
Tegmark’s MUH is the hypothesis that our external physical reality is a mathematical structure.[3] That is, the physical universe is not merely described by mathematics, but is mathematics — specifically, a mathematical structure.
Look, I only heard about this concept, so maybe there’s more to it, but branches of mathematics are just a set of rules that we create.
Sometimes these rules can be applied to real systems, in our reality, and that helps to describe and understand the universe.
But it’s totally possible to come up with infinite nonsensical, useless mathematical systems that have nothing to do with the universe. The existence of these doesn’t mean that we have or could rewrite reality.
Would you like to say a few words?
“Trump is America’s self inflicted gunshot wound”
“Actually Natural Gas” “Orbital Fusion”
Yeah, fuck them for trying
I wonder if it’s a kind of stir-bar, put it in a container and oscillate a magnetic field outside to move the contents around.
I agree with the sentiment, but this article is a click farm.
Here is all the content:
I think of the Commodore Amiga as the first psychedelic computer. Celso Martinho, though, is willing to go a step further: he thinks it was the first perfect computer.
I consider the A1000 a significant piece of home computing history. Arguably one of the most important machines of the 16-bit revolution period, considered by many to be the first multimedia computer, it marked the beginning of Commodore’s last cycle, after the huge success of the C64, in the history of personal computing.
I tried to learn coding on the Commodore Amiga and didn’t get far; my problem was I wanted to make games that looked as good as stuff like Shadow of the Beast and it got difficult quickly thanks to all the powerful parts that weren’t a Motorola 68000.
I think knowing the BB number of a set is akin to knowing that all problems in that set are either halting or non-halting. I don’t think the important part is the number itself but rather knowing that all programs have been checked.
Hence, once BB(27) is known then that will mean the Goltbach conjecture is proven true or false.
Je Boof Tu Boofe Il/Elle/On Boofes Nous Boofons Vous Boofez
https://youtu.be/pQWFSj1CXeg if you want to know more
Trump is America’s self-inflicted gunshot wound
Probably used for test submissions for acceptance testing, demonstrations, system validation, etc so they can filter out fake data from the stats.
It’s a very smart idea, but someone forgot the step where they hide/disable it when the site went live.
From a certain point of view
Agreed, nothing too obscure or domain specific. Some good false leads to make you second guess yourself.
The size of small Easter eggs (you know, the ones about as big as grapes)