I’m more concerned that you’re asserting everything else is in plant based foods. it’s not and you should stop lying to people before they hurt themselves.

merry christmas, jerkface

there is no proof seeds or nuts want anything at all

oh. you’re not vegan: you’re ecofash.

what is the term for being condescending, while also being wrong?

you are spreading medical misinformation.

this is nonsensical gibberish.

sterilize

sounds like you don’t actually care about their autonomy.

supplement your diet with B12. That’s the only nutrient that can’t be found naturally in plant-based sources

that’s not true

comparing slaves to animals is exactly what slavers do

throwing ordnances at matt walsh

kolektiva did not mean to give it up. it was poor security practice: keeping old drives unencrypted, and getting busted on other charges

sunshine isn’t an anarchist, they are an instigator

anarchism is socialist. it’s often called libertarian socialist.

exarcheia, and the Paris commune

multiplayer shooters with unlockable weapons/classes

you haven’t read any critical rationalists, and it shows.

edit: I accidentally a couple letters, but look at this fucking bad faith and proud ignorance

edit: it’s understandable I guess that when your worldview is threatened, you slink off pretending you were right all along.

now who looks ignorant

duvergers “law” is more of a tautology. it doesn’t describe any actual natural phenomenon like gravity does

duverger’s law is a tautology because, from a critical rationalist perspective, a tautological statement cannot be empirically tested or falsified. it’s true by definition. duverger’s law states that a plurality-rule election system tends to favor a two-party system. however, if this law is framed in such a way that any outcome can be rationalized within its parameters, then it becomes unfalsifiable.

for example, if a country with a plurality-rule system has more than two parties, one might argue that the system still “tends to” favor two parties, and the current state is an exception or transition phase. this kind of reasoning makes the law immune to counterexamples, and thus, it operates more as a tautological statement than an empirical hypothesis.

the critical rationalist critique of marginalist economics, which relies on ceteris paribus (all else being equal) conditions, suggests any similarly structured law should be viewed with skepticism. for duverger’s law to be more than a tautology, it would need to be stated in a way that allows for clear empirical testing and potential falsification, without the possibility of explaining away any contradictory evidence. this would make it a substantive theory that can contribute to our understanding of political systems rather than a mere tautology.

Both sides"ing Democrats in general elections helps MAGA, that is a simple fact.

wrong