Oh no, don’t get me wrong - it’s here to stay. In some fields it will grow bigger, and others it will disappear. We’re now just in a phase where it’s being applied to everything to see what sticks - and that hype phase will come to an end at some point.

Yeah that one was easy to fix, thanks for the help nonetheless!

Excellent, thanks!

It doesn’t seem to be all settings - my accounts are still there, but it also changed the default landing page from Subscribed to All.

Yeah, I wouldn’t take trading advice from a group of people who are desperately hoping a for a certain technology to not exist.

Is AI overhyped and overused? Absolutely. Is its use doing to decrease? Most likely. Will it “collapse”? Don’t bet on it. Or, well, do - I suppose. It’s your money to lose.

Do those goal posts you keep moving come with wheels, or do you have to carry them by hand?

I just wish people would leave more comments about how they don’t like AI. If AI is not gone by 2030, the only reason is because people didn’t comment about it enough.

I got 4 paragraphs in, and still no sign of what the dirty deal was.

Anybody got a tldr other than “AI bad”?

Problem, possibly. Just not because of enshitification, since that has a very specific meaning.

As much as they are making an asshat of themselves here, I fail to see how that’s relevant.

So are you starting to see the issue here, or do you think that my bike is an online platform?

Do you really think that’s the definition of that term? “something that no longer works”?

By that logic, my bike has been enshitified because it has a flat tire.

You can either pick a battle that you cannot win (assuming you’re not the one in charge of the many millions such a migration would cost). You can just deal with it, or you can look for better circumstances.

You say you’re convincing people, management sees a trouble maker who’s spreading unhappiness.

In my opinion, it’s better to save your energy for something where it can make a change, not a futile attempt at trying to make an institute drop Outlook or Teams, or whatever shitty software we’re talking about.

But hey, this is just my advice. You do you.

Uhuh. Let me know how that works for you, out in a real corporate setting.

In my experience you can say all you want (if you’re lucky), but in the end, switching providers on a large scale costs a lot of money. And their money is more important than your discomfort.

But the closest thing to the 6 TB Microsoft offers, would be the 10TB from filen at €400 a year. Whereas with Microsoft, it’s only $120 a year and you get all the other services. Say what you will about the quality of MS products, but they are the cheaper option here.

I’m guessing the vast majority of its users are students and corporate employees, neither of which get a say in which software is used.

Everything is political.

That’s debatable, but it might be in your life. However, not everything political is tech.

And my reason for having high standards is that lowering them would expose me to too much garbage.

The reason I’m subscribed here, and not on lemmy.world!technology, is that that place will allow anything that gets clicks - even if it’s only tangentially related to actual tech.

Hence, the amount of rants about Musk is through the roof.

I had higher hopes for this place, but it does require moderation. Your post, with all due respect, is just political circlejerk clickbait.

If the person who tweeted that was the head of a fertiliser company, do you think this post would be fit for a gardening community?

Hmmnope. Replacing it with Russia, or Trump, or whichever political entity didn’t make it any less political for me.

Let’s face it: this post does vaguely concern a tech company - in the sense that it wants to highlight the political opinion or quote of a figurehead of a tech company.

So tell me honestly - is this mostly about tech news, or is it mostly about politics?

I think you accidentally posted this on technology, but you were looking for politics.

This guy gets it.