I sincerely thank you for your honest and nuanced take, but I don’t fully agree on one thing - Even in this thread you can see people arguing that giving money to (or “having dinner with”) makes you equal to a nazi.

That is the part I object to, because by becoming so extremely polarising, it robs the word of all meaning. I might be too moderate for lemmy (I assure you I have voted leftwing parties for most of my adult life), but to me when I see someone described as a “literal nazi” nowadays I can’t help but wonder “internet nazi or actual nazi”?

So when I object to things like this, it’s because I fear for the damage this actually does to proper discourse, to fighting actual nazis. I don’t give a shit about Omarchy myself (I prefer debian based distros :p), but when someone describes it as “a distro for fascists”, you’re just alienating those users - 99% of whom are probably not even aware of the politically charged reasons behind it. It just feels like virtue signaling to me, and meanwhile only furthering the divide between people.

Again, I think it’s good people call 1password and the others out. But do so on the right basis, like: “What you’re doing is amplifying hate speech”, rather than “you are nazis”.

Peace.

(edit, that came or longer than I intended, my apologies)

I think xenophobic racist shitbag would be less ambiguous.

Try btop, it’s prettier and even includes gpu.

Yeah, like fighting actual nazis.

Not circlejerking on the Internet about millionaires or comparing the usage of a Linux distro to genocide.

Well, I chose to preserve that term to those who are more on the physical side of the spectrum - which, I do admit, David Hansson is crouching up close to.

But this bullshit about everyone who associates with him to whatever degree being just as bad (orcgirl was up to three, but if you follow the logic, it’s infinite) is absolutely devaluing the meaning of the word.

That, if anything, is helping the actual nazis just as badly.

And you guys used to be better at fighting actual problems.

Fair enough, I phrased that ambiguously.

My issue was with the recursive definition of “nazi” - you are one if you associate with one or if you associate with someone who associate with one. That would mean petty much everyone alive, excluding some uncontacted tribes.

To me, that kind of self-referential logic is utter bullshit. From what I can tell, David Hansson is absolutely a racist xenophobic piece of shit. But the actual nazis were way worse than that. And devaluing it to someone who n degrees away once had dinner with someone is utter insanity, and pissing on the graves of all that died in the second world war.

I absolutely have no idea.

And I find it hard to believe that you do keep track of that. Do you, like, have those 3rd degree acquintances forward their calendars to you? Must be a day job.

Agree to disagree. To me that meme format literally is someone asking “why is everybody talking about X”. It got some actual in depth answers “this is what it is, this is why people are upset” and then it got deleted.

So now we’re back at the point where there’s less info about what it actually is, only that it’s bad.

Before moving the goal posts, let’s stick with the original premise of the people at the table.

So if that first person left, and someone else joins that table, is that person then also a nazi? Because by that logic, yeah - everyone is a nazi, you included.

The post itself: https://lemmy.today/pictrs/image/76e8be0a-8339-40a7-a4aa-92d6a0c327fb.png

Removal reason:

reason: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succès_de_scandale

Source: https://lemmy.ml/modlog?page=7&amp%3BactionType=ModRemovePost (the link is paginated, so it will only be accurate for a short while)

And yeah, keyword filtering is a feature from the Android client Lemmy Connect, it’s not server side, unfortunately.

Meanwhile the other day a post here asking “What actually is the deal with Omarchy?” got deleted.

I feel this is more about people signaling they dislike he who should not be named (other than initials) than, you know, what is actually wrong with the product.

The same thing happened with the technology communities and Trump / Musk. I sincerely do not care about these people or their opinions. I’m here for the tech news, not a circlejerk about whom the Internet considers a nazi. I guess I will just have to add a few more keywords to filter now.

deleted by creator

Definitely. The problem with cyber security (regardless of AI) is that as a defender you have to be successful all the time, while as an attacker you only need to get lucky once.

Thank you for this in depth reply rather than the standard non-informative circlejerk comments that only fuel the curiosity, and thereby, the attention.

Yeah, but if we assume that one row means 50 csam images, it sounds even more outrageous.

Being reasonable never got anyone any clicks.

So what, so far, has given you the indication that lemmy and its users are the best place / willing to provide that?

Because to compete with reddit, you need reddit funds. To get those funds, you need to be inoffensive for the sponsors, and attractive to the lowest common denominator in order to attract eyeballs.

Lemmy isn’t just software, it’s community, formed by people. People who like it small, because once it grows too big, quality plummets. And that’s what people here want to prevent. If you want reddit, go to reddit.

“Even if a bystander notices the Glasses and agrees to be recorded, he or she cannot have consented to the mass amalgamation of their data when the Glasses are in AI mode,” the amended complaint said, “including visual recordings that are collected, stored, exploited, and visually inspected by persons overseas, because Defendants have made no effort to disclose these practices to bystanders or to seek their consent.”

…

Meta disputes the allegations, telling Fortune: “We disagree with these allegations and will fight them. Our glasses help you use AI hands free to answer questions about the world around you. If you use Meta AI, we may review that data to help improve our products and people’s experiences—this works the same way as many other companies.”

Their way of fighting the allegations seems to be “but others do it too!”

Good.

Very good.

I’m sure the German court will have a field day.

Fully agree with you on physical media. It was fun while it lasted.

But if you harass employees of a company, and that company decides to stop having you as a customer, that is called common sense or “the consequences of your own actions”.

Just stop giving them your money, vote with your feet, etc.