See? Only one moderator has access to the modlog, but nobody believed me, lol.

Anyway, that clarifies what I’ve been saying. There you can see the ban, which wasn’t months ago. Although, if it’s true that “there are errors in Lemmy” and my posts only disappeared a week ago, I can accept that explanation. That said, I didn’t accuse you of anything other than the Digital Art ban (the queerphobia and homophobia came from other people, and I’m not even interested in the community where I contacted you; I just went there to contact you and then left). And I don’t want to appeal it. I still insist that Lemmy’s direct messaging (not the apps I don’t want to download) isn’t secure, and the message itself says so. I also don’t know where to see a message if I receive one because there’s no chat icon. I don’t know if you think I’m new to social media because I’m not. I don’t need a tutorial, but if the platform is missing something essential, it’s obvious that anyone would take a shortcut like commenting on other sites. And because of how I had to resort to a “public statement” for someone to listen. Likewise, even if you don’t want to be a moderator, which is understandable, while you still are one you should listen to your users when they tell you that a sanction was unfair, because I already clarified, my uploaded content there isn’t furry, and the term isn’t an opinion, it’s a fact. As an artist, although you’re not obligated to understand or accept every aspect of art, you also can’t base a historical term (like what is and isn’t furry) on a personal opinion. Avoiding listening to me was, from my perspective and experiences with people like that, simply washing your hands of an issue that could have easily been resolved with a couple of correct actions. Being responsible isn’t about evading the issue, even if you don’t want to be contacted through other means. It doesn’t matter if they say (referring to both moderators and users of this thread) that I’m “the villain” (also because of the points system, they don’t deny my point) because the record only confirms what I said, and I’m also aware of what I did and didn’t do, just as I’m willing to accept if I made any mistakes, like blaming you (although only partially, as I said, you could appeal or try to talk even in the comments) or accepting that the fact that my posts disappeared a week after (not months ago) the ban, because platform errors happen (Lemmy is very unstable) and I’m not certain if that’s what happened or not.

I doubt you’ll even consider lifting my ban; otherwise, you would have done it from the start. But whether you lift it or not, it’s clear your colleague (if it’s not an automated bot, though you’re also a moderator manually) doesn’t seem to like my art, and I don’t think I’m treated well there. It’s up to you whether you lift it, and then I’ll decide whether to stay or leave. This whole thing is ridiculous and could have ended with a simple discussion.

I read that comment before it disappeared, although I think he could have appealed the ban and he didn’t. What a waste to post there. (And partly this post that went nowhere, just people bothering).

P.S: In Shinbone Alley, they’re normal cats; they don’t interact with humans like humans. Like Tom and Jerry. But in that case, I can somewhat justify the confusion.

People just want to hate. My stuff isn’t even furry, and they treat it like I posted something inappropriate. I’ve stopped getting angry and just respond with mockery.

That’s the date the post was created. The date of the manual ban isn’t public and can only be viewed through Modlog. Considering you commented about three times without any response from me, I’ll say this now: Si sí, ya te vi.

I know, when you explain once, it’s fine, twice if you’re generous, but if they ask for three explanations, it’s because the other person is stupid.

You mean I invented terms from centuries ago…? Nambreh si soy una cosa bárbara y ni yo sabía.

They’re trying to force things on me, lies, wow, what a lovely place Lemmy is! I appreciate those who offer me support, even those who are ambiguous. Unfortunately, there are many people who seem allergic to research and don’t understand that my art went months without being banned. The moderation dates are from when the post was published, and I know this because, unlike some, I realized the ban happened a week ago, and before that, my drawings remained untouched because they always reappeared. It doesn’t even matter anymore whether I believe it or not; the outcome isn’t going to change, and I’ll continue with this unfair ban. But at least I defended myself. That art community is a mess, and many of the comments only reinforce the idiocy of all this; they always turn a plea for help into a circus. Grow up! It’s all a race to see who’s right instead of reasoning. I’ve been on the internet long enough to know who’s an idiot and who isn’t. This will be my last comment on the subject because they are truly exhausting, and I can be sure that I told the truth.

Como decimos nosotros en estas situaciones: Cállense gringos.

The dates shown in the history aren’t from the exact moment the post was deleted, but from the moment it was published. A otro idiota con ese cuento.

First, I was never notified, and it was a week ago that I saw the deleted posts. Although I don’t have a screenshot of how much time passed, I don’t need to make a big deal out of something that “was fair,” and in this case, it wasn’t. That tactic of taking screenshots of deleted posts to say “we warned you for months” when the ban was only a week ago is cheap manipulation. By deleting the posts recently due to the ban, they create false “evidence” that they try to pass off as a long history of “disobedience.” It’s a way to justify their own incompetence and lack of artistic judgment. If the ban was a week ago, there are no “months” of warnings. They’re trying to rewrite the timeline to make it seem like I’m the “rebel” and you’re the “patient” ones, when in reality, you’re the ones who can’t distinguish a human figure from a furry. Furthermore, I realized something while being “new to Lemmy” that you either don’t or conveniently choose not to mention. The dates you show in your screenshot aren’t from the exact moment the post was deleted; they’re from the moment the post was made. Therefore, your “argument” that “they’ve been deleting them for months” is even more invalid. And I literally realized this by looking at your own deleted comments and posts. How ironic that a newbie foreigner would notice something so convenient, right? So yes, I’m still right that I was banned a week ago without any prior warning.

Second, is this the same old issue of whether I post in English again? Seriously? Some of you seem to think only Americans post here. These sites are universal, and English is used for that purpose, whether you like it or not. I’m noticing a certain condescension regarding this issue, which isn’t even relevant to the case itself. Do you expect me to post in my language when many probably won’t translate it? What a ridiculous argument. The “you don’t know English and you still post” attack is pure xenophobia. On a global platform like Lemmy, using a translator to participate is perfectly valid. Using it as a weapon to invalidate your technical opinion about art is pathetic. Basically, they’re telling you: “You don’t have the right to defend your art if you don’t speak our language perfectly.”

Third, believe me, I did want to contact the moderators, but as I said, messaging on this site doesn’t guarantee that my messages will reach them, and there isn’t even a chat section outside of other apps the site recommends, and I’m not going to register there. Or maybe it’s just my own inability to know where it is or how to use it. I’m not going to mess with something I don’t know.

Fourth, I never said “I don’t know how to post,” read carefully, I wrote “I post on Lemmy and I’m leaving.” You can accuse me of whatever you want, but I didn’t break any rules. They never warned me because I never received any notifications, and that “they deleted it months ago” thing—so why did the posts disappear a week ago? Your accusation doesn’t make sense. I’ve literally been posting since October, and the few posts I published—I never received a single warning, nor did anyone even tell me, “We consider this furry” (even though it isn’t, under any circumstances). If I hadn’t posted my characters, I would have stopped posting, period. I would have posted something else or just left on my own. But if you think I’m such a bad user for defending my art against injustice, that’s your problem. I know what I did and what I didn’t do.

Literally, the only furry thing is the TMNT fanart; the rest aren’t furries. But you guys don’t seem to get that. I’ve been polite, I’ve been patient, but calling me a liar is a whole other level for you. And on top of that, you’re being condescending about the language, as if posting in English, Spanish, Italian, French, or whatever is important. What a way to deflect the issue and make me look like a problem for something you did without even telling me.

Having said all that, because I don’t plan to continue a fight I didn’t start, but rather wanted to end before it became a public circus due to your incompetence. If I’m the villain in your story, fine, I’m not going to keep justifying the obvious; I’ve already made everything crystal clear.

Technically and literally I didn’t infringe on anything because it’s not furry-related. What she creates without knowing what she’s banning is another matter entirely.

Two points: 1- I already explained what furry is and what it isn’t.

2- I use a translator and translate the page.

3- An extra point, haha. Here’s an example of a yokai demon with a kemonomimi. Art I uploaded there.

4- Another extra example, normal/mythical animal art, without a antro.

They’re confused because they lump everything related to animals into the category of furry, and it isn’t. I assume that since you’re a furry, you wouldn’t compare a human or demon with animal features to a furry (or even a therian), much less a normal or mythical animal. Furthermore, according to that moderator’s “logic,” a fairy and a mermaid (things she posts in her communities) are furries—that’s how ridiculous this is.

I’d been posting stuff about a demon and a woman with wolf ears and a tail for months, not furries. There was never a single comment from the moderators about it, and like I said, it’s not furry.

I’ll try.

I’ll try, although I have no expectations.

Following that absurd logic, a dog fetching its leash or an otter using a rock to crack open a clam are “furries.” It’s ridiculous. Holding an object in their mouth is a natural physical ability of canids; they aren’t using hands, they aren’t walking on two legs, they don’t have human anatomy. It’s a wolf doing something a wolf can do.

Level 1 (Humanoid/Kemonomimi): 95% human, 5% animal. (Not furry).

Level 2 (Anthro/Furry): 50% human, 50% animal. (This is furry).

Level 3 (Feral/Creature): 5% human (mind), 95% animal (body). (Not furry).

That final phrase, “you can argue all you want, but you’re simply wrong,” is the tactic of someone who’s run out of arguments and is just too lazy to learn about something they clearly don’t know. It’s a way of ending the dialogue because you can’t refute my visual examples. If you want to keep arguing about something you haven’t researched, that’s your problem. I’m leaving it here because, honestly, it’s exhausting.

According to the direct message, it’s not secure, and I’m not going to create an account on other secure messaging apps. I already said that.

That’s still a very common fallacy. If you don’t believe me, just search or read my comments. Don’t use misused popular labels; I’m tired of explaining it. And no, the same applies in any language; the fact that you shouldn’t search for or call everything “furry” is another matter.