Yes in this case i would not disagree. The overall stats look no good and if it is a single drive then yes. Get the data off.
I take issue with the general statement of yours:
If that number stays anything not 0, that means it’s toast. Can’t rely on it.
For data integrity you do not rely on single drives but on for example FS that handle that.
As i said in another post, the important thing about smart is not the values itself but if they are start to increase or not.
And even if an read error occurs, the sector gets remapped and you can restore the block/file from backup or the fs will handle it without interference.
Thats bullshit. I have multiple drives that have pending sector count higher then 1 and they perform perfectly fine after that for years now.
It is much more important if the numbers are increasing then how high the numbers are. You can have multiple bad sectors or on SSDs Media Errors and the drive will be good for years to come.
I would recommend data hygiene in the first place. Have a working backup! And if you can afford it (can you afford to loose your data) some kind of redundancy like raid zfs or therelike.
I have as of now multiple drives at home and work in operation that have some form of error but have not changed their error values in literally years. Could i have afforded to replace the drives? Sure, but i also could have had a drive as a replacement that fails during the first resilver of the array.
Simple put, no. In order to be save with a LLM that can execute stuff on its own it needs to be completely sandboxed.
A very nice talk about flaws in agentic AI can be found here: https://media.ccc.de/v/39c3-agentic-probllms-exploiting-ai-computer-use-and-coding-agents
I can also recommend the object storage from hetzner for backups. Quite price competitive.
It actually does both. Not really tested the multimonitor features but its there and it works, not sure if to the same degree as in rdp.
There is a box for manually added monthly savings. But yes, hard to classify what you would actually subscribe to if you would not have a server already.
But same for video. I would never buy 3 streaking service at a time.
The other answer is already good but I answer more general.
Rate limiting. Do not allow as many requests as your CPU can handle but limit authentication requests. Like a couple requests per second already goes a long way.
The ‘immediate attacks’ ppl mention is just static background noise. Server / scripts that run trying to find misconfigured, highly out to date or exploitable endpoints/servers/software.
Once you update your software, set up basic brute force protection and maybe regional blocking, you do not have to worry about this kind of attack.
Much more scary are so called 0-Day attacks.
As i already said, no one will waste time on you, there are so much easier targets out there that do not follow those basic rules or actually valuable targets.
There is obviously more that you can do, like hiding everything behind a VPN or advanced thread detections. Also choosing the kind of software you want to run is relevant.
This is not really a weakness in the bitlocker encryption but in the TPM used to store the secrets if you set it up like that.
Different to most at least somewhat popular software futo is involved in, immich is foss. It’s AGPL licensed and community driven.
the install process has changed completely
The exact steps on how you tried to install it would help.
Yeah I’m not saying its perfect and LLMs are non-deterministic so it could give you some crap. You’re not wrong and it’s good to be aware of that. How do you verify some random stranger from the internet wasn’t an asshole and gave you malicious config? 🤷
There is no guarantee either, but on a public forum at least a couple of eyes look at it too. Not saying that this makes it trust worthy. But a LLM usually words it output very direct and saying “this is the absolut truth” which can lead to a much higher trust relation then a stranger on a forum that writes “maybe try this”.
I generelly would not recommend using the llm for potential security related questions (or important or professionally questions) were your own knowledge is not big enough to quickly vet the output.
You are still talking about someone that is not able to create the config themself, but that someone should be able to test everything?
But still, how would verify if the config is good or not? For example if it exposes root?
The discussion is about low effort Link only Video and or others Posts. If you are not reffering to them then you missed the point.
It seems, the majority does not want it.
If ppl do not like it they can use another selfhosted from another instance. Thats what lemmy or the fediverse is build for.
Most ppl seem to agree with me.
And those handwritten notes are secure random passwords and never repeat?
Just too much work for the average person and too inconvenient to type.